Oklahoma‘s tax system ranks 21st overall on the 2025 State Tax Competitiveness Index. In recent years, Oklahoma lawmakers have adopted several structural reforms, including eliminating the income tax’s marriage penalty and repealing a capital stock tax. However, the state’s individual income tax code features six brackets and is not indexed for inflation. This leaves taxpayers vulnerable to bracket creep, which occurs when inflation pushes a taxpayer from a lower bracket to a higher one when nominal income rises, but due to inflation, real income does not, or may even decline.
Oklahoma’s property taxes are relatively low, and the state has benefited from the repeal of the capital stock tax. Capital stock taxes are imposed on a business’s net worth (or accumulated wealth) and tend to penalize investment. Moreover, businesses are required to pay the capital stock tax regardless of profitability. However, the state continues to tax business inventory, which is also levied regardless of profitability. Such taxes are nonneutral and disproportionately affect those businesses with larger inventories, causing taxpayers to make inefficient timing and location decisions with their inventory.
Oklahoma was the first state to adopt permanent first-year full expensing for qualifying investments in machinery and equipment. This boosted the state’s competitiveness, particularly as the federal provision began to phase out. Those states that continue to conform to the federal provision are less competitive in this regard.
Oklahoma has a single corporate tax rate at 4 percent; however, the state does not conform to federal depletion rules, which is like depreciation but applies to natural resources. The corporate code also features some nonneutral incentive credits for jobs and investment. The state’s throwback rule is inefficient and taxes “nowhere income” in the state from which sales are made because the seller lacks sufficient nexus to be taxed in the destination state, leading to taxation in the wrong state at the wrong rate.
The State Tax Competitiveness Index enables policymakers, taxpayers, and business leaders to gauge how their states’ tax systems compare. While there are many ways to show how much state governments collect in taxes, the Index evaluates how well states structure their tax systems and provides a road map for improvement.
States that tax GILTI increase filing complexity, drive up the cost of tax compliance, and introduce unnecessary economic uncertainty and legal risk. 21 states and DC continue to tax GILTI despite these challenges.
Sports stadium subsidies are salient political gimmicks designed to appear as if politicians are providing tangible benefits to taxpayers. The empirical evidence shows repeatedly that stadium subsidies fail to generate new tax revenue and new jobs or attract new businesses.