Movers and Shakers in the 2026 State Tax Competitiveness Index
In the spirit of change and improvement, it’s worth looking back to see which states have truly embraced tax competitiveness since 2020, and which ones have lagged behind.
6 min read
California | #48 Overall
California combines high tax rates with an uncompetitive tax structure, yielding one of the worst rankings on the Index. The state has a great deal going for it, with its mild climate, excellent research universities, and the ongoing agglomeration effects of Silicon Valley (which is seeing a resurgence with the rise of generative AI), but a tax code that is uncompetitive and threatens to get worse is increasingly driving jobs to other states.
The state’s top marginal individual income tax rate of 13.3 percent is compounded by a 1.1 percent uncapped payroll tax, bringing the all-in top rate to 14.4 percent. Additionally, nonresidents must file income taxes if they work even a single day in the state, and California is one of only four states to still impose an alternative minimum tax.
California is the only state to deny all net operating loss carryforwards; the state’s NOL provisions have been suspended on multiple occasions and are not currently in effect. It is also the only state to use the outmoded ACRS depreciation system rather than MACRS, and does not allow any accelerated first-year expensing. California has a throwback rule, exposing in-state businesses to additional corporate tax liability for certain out-of-state income that would not be taxed elsewhere. The state is also dramatically out of conformity with the federal tax code as of the snapshot date of this Index, though legislation to bring conformity forward by a decade was on the governor’s desk at the time of publication. Even this conformity bill would be outdated from the start, however, predating changes adopted as part of 2025’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). Delayed conformity adds to tax complexity, though California’s current 2015 conformity date has certain benefits: the state does not, for instance, currently incorporate global intangible low-taxed income (or net CFC-tested income under the OBBBA), which does not belong in state tax codes but has been incorporated by some states.
Property taxes in California are constrained by Proposition 13 and subsequent enactments that cap growth in taxable assessed value. This keeps property taxes lower than they would be otherwise—especially for long-time incumbent owners—but at the cost of significant distortions to property markets.
| Category | Rank | Rank Change | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 48 | 0 | 3.81 |
| Corporate Taxes | 41 | 0 | 4.60 |
| Individual Income Taxes | 49 | 0 | 2.27 |
| Sales Taxes | 46 | -1 | 3.79 |
| Property Taxes | 27 | -2 | 5.06 |
| Unemployment Insurance Taxes | 26 | -1 | 5.12 |
- Learn more about California Taxes
-
Share your state results
Compare Neighboring States
Tax Data by State
Get facts about taxes in your state and around the U.S.
More on California
2026 State Tax Competitiveness Index
The State Tax Competitiveness Index enables policymakers, taxpayers, and business leaders to gauge how their states’ tax systems compare. While there are many ways to show how much state governments collect in taxes, the Index evaluates how well states structure their tax systems and provides a road map for improvement.
122 min read
The State Tax Competitiveness Index Is Your Guide to Economic “Wins Above Replacement”
Taxes are an important part of the mix, and modernizing a state’s tax structure helps position it for growth. States that rank better on the Index have better-structured tax codes, and states with better-structured tax codes get Wins Above Replacement.
5 min read