North Carolina‘s tax system ranks 12th overall on the 2025 State Tax Competitiveness Index. Of the states that levy all the major taxes, North Carolina is among the highest performers on the Index, with its flat 4.5 percent individual income tax rate, low 2.5 percent corporate income tax rate (slated for eventual repeal), and relatively competitive property and sales tax systems. These low rates are made possible in part by North Carolina’s decision to forgo many nonneutral and distortive business tax credits, such as jobs, R&D, and investment tax credits, and for its commitment—secured through a series of reforms in the past decade—to broad bases and low rates.
North Carolina does, however, have room for improvement in its treatment of business net operating losses, as the state allows only 15 years of net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards, whereby past losses can be deducted from current or future profits to ensure the tax falls on average long-run profitability and to avoid subjecting cyclical businesses to a penalty. Additionally, North Carolina’s bonus depreciation allowance is only 15 percent, substantially lower than the federal allowance. Moving forward, the state could rectify this adverse treatment of investment by adopting permanent full expensing separate from the federal Section 168(k) provision. Furthermore, North Carolina’s Section 179 expensing limit is only $25,000, significantly lower than the $1 million federal allowance. Finally, the largest barrier to the state’s tax competitiveness remains its capital stock tax, called the franchise tax, which is unusually aggressive and taxes businesses on their worth rather than their profits, harming investment and yielding a tax levied without regard to ability to pay.
The State Tax Competitiveness Index enables policymakers, taxpayers, and business leaders to gauge how their states’ tax systems compare. While there are many ways to show how much state governments collect in taxes, the Index evaluates how well states structure their tax systems and provides a road map for improvement.
States that tax GILTI increase filing complexity, drive up the cost of tax compliance, and introduce unnecessary economic uncertainty and legal risk. 21 states and DC continue to tax GILTI despite these challenges.
Sports stadium subsidies are salient political gimmicks designed to appear as if politicians are providing tangible benefits to taxpayers. The empirical evidence shows repeatedly that stadium subsidies fail to generate new tax revenue and new jobs or attract new businesses.