Vermont‘s tax system ranks 43rd overall on the 2025 State Tax Competitiveness Index. Vermont levies all major categories of taxation with comparatively high rates and an overall uncompetitive tax structure. As a result, the tax code makes the state both nationally and regionally uncompetitive, particularly compared to neighboring low-tax New Hampshire.
Vermont levies an individual income tax with multiple brackets, including a top marginal rate of 8.75 percent; the tax also includes a marriage penalty for joint filers. The Green Mountain State levies a tax at a flat rate of 16 percent on estates worth more than $5 million.
Property taxpayers in the state are subject to a high effective rate of taxation, second only to Maine. Further, property tax collections per capita in the state are among the highest in the country ($3,001). The state’s sales tax base is unnecessarily narrow and exempts many personal goods and services while also subjecting many business inputs to the tax, which causes tax pyramiding and ultimately increases the costs borne by consumers.
The Vermont corporate tax features three brackets with a top marginal rate of 8.5 percent. Importantly, these brackets are not indexed for inflation, meaning taxpayers will be forced into a higher tax bracket when their nominal income increases, but due to inflation, their real income does not (or even declines). Net operating loss carryforwards are limited to 10 years, with no corresponding carryback allowance, and Vermont is among the minority of states that tax global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI). Vermont also has a throwback rule, which subjects a portion of businesses’ out-of-state income to Vermont’s corporate income tax.
Thirty-nine states will begin 2025 with notable tax changes, including nine states cutting individual income taxes. Recent years have seen a wave of significant tax reforms, and the changes scheduled for 2025 show that these efforts have not let up.
Tax avoidance is a natural consequence of tax policy. Policymakers should consider the unintended consequences, both to public health and public coffers, of the excise taxes and regulatory regimes for cigarettes and other nicotine products.
Many policies, such as minimum wage levels, tax brackets, and means-tested public benefit income thresholds, are denominated in nominal dollars, even though a dollar in one region may go much further than a dollar in another. Lawmakers should keep that reality in mind as they make changes to tax and economic policies.