Washington‘s tax system ranks 45th overall on the 2025 State Tax Competitiveness Index. Washington forgoes an individual income tax on wage income due to constitutional constraints, though the state recently imposed a tax on high earners’ capital gains income, a policy that raised constitutional questions but ultimately secured the assent of the state supreme court. The constitution has been similarly interpreted as blocking a corporate income tax, but Washington instead imposes a high multiple-rate gross receipts tax, called the Business & Occupation Tax. Because it is based on gross revenues rather than net income (profits), it yields very high rates of taxation on low-margin businesses and leads to tax pyramiding, where goods and services have the tax embedded several times over, imposed on each transaction within the production process.
The state’s sales tax, imposed atop the gross receipts tax, is not just a high rate but is also imposed on a base that includes an unusual share of business inputs, particularly in the digital products space. Washington also levies a progressive real estate transfer tax and the nation’s highest-rate estate tax. High UI taxes and an uncompetitive UI tax structure also contribute to the state’s poor Index ranking despite the state forgoing an individual income tax, which might otherwise be expected to yield a much more competitive tax environment.
Thirty-nine states will begin 2025 with notable tax changes, including nine states cutting individual income taxes. Recent years have seen a wave of significant tax reforms, and the changes scheduled for 2025 show that these efforts have not let up.
Tax avoidance is a natural consequence of tax policy. Policymakers should consider the unintended consequences, both to public health and public coffers, of the excise taxes and regulatory regimes for cigarettes and other nicotine products.
Many policies, such as minimum wage levels, tax brackets, and means-tested public benefit income thresholds, are denominated in nominal dollars, even though a dollar in one region may go much further than a dollar in another. Lawmakers should keep that reality in mind as they make changes to tax and economic policies.