All Related Articles
Full Expensing Costs Less Than You’d Think
Full expensing could grow the long-run size of the U.S. economy by 4.2 percent, which would lead to 3.6 percent higher wages and 808,000 full-time jobs. What’s more, it wouldn’t cost as much revenue as some think.
12 min readWhy Temporary Corporate Income Tax Cuts Won’t Generate Much Growth
Real tax reform should boost incomes for all. A corporate income tax cut could be a means to do that, but not if it’s temporary. A temporary cut is less likely to promote growth and less likely to benefit American workers.
14 min readDelivering Tax Relief to D.C. Taxpayers
2 min readInterest Deductibility – Issues and Reforms
Interest deductibility creates holes in the tax base, distorts corporate investment strategies, and contributes to a potentially dangerous macroeconomic environment of overleveraging.
17 min readWhy Full Expensing Encourages More Investment than A Corporate Rate Cut
If economic growth is the goal of your tax reform plan, moving towards full expensing and a cash-flow tax is the most efficient way to spur investment,
5 min readCompetitiveness Impact of Tax Reform for the United States
U.S. taxes on new business investment are uncompetitive globally. While corporate tax rate reductions would have a significant impact on competitiveness, expensing proposals currently being considered would add much more grease to make the wheels turn in the U.S. economy.
16 min read