Skip to content

2026 International Tax Competitiveness Index

The structure of a country’s tax code is a determining factor of its economic performance. A well-structured tax code is easy for taxpayers to comply with and can promote economic development while raising sufficient revenue for a government’s priorities. In contrast, poorly structured tax systems can be costly, distort economic decision-making, and harm domestic economies.

Many countries have recognized this and have reformed their tax codes. Over the past few decades, marginal tax rates on corporate and individual income have declined significantly across the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Now, most OECD nations raise a significant amount of revenue from broad-based taxes such as payroll taxes and value-added taxes (VAT).

Not all recent changes in tax policy among OECD countries have improved the structure of tax systems; some had a negative impact. Though some countries, like Austria, have reduced their corporate income tax rates by several percentage points, others, like France, the Slovak Republic, and Slovenia, have increased them. Corporate tax base improvements have occurred in Canada, Germany, Lithuania, the United Kingdom, and the United States, while the corporate tax base has been made less competitive in the Czech Republic and Slovenia. Germany and Finland are phasing out temporary improvements to their corporate tax bases that Lithuania, the United Kingdom, and the United States have made permanent and expanded.

In recent years, tax policy has increasingly drifted away from its traditional roles of raising government revenue and encouraging investment into the toolbox of international tax and trade disputes, with import tariffs, digital service levies, and extraterritorial taxes deployed to exert economic pressure. In this environment, policymakers should refocus on neutral, internationally competitive tax policies that raise revenue with minimal harm to investment and economic growth. The variety of approaches to taxation among OECD countries creates a need to evaluate these systems relative to each other. For that purpose, we have developed the International Tax Competitiveness Index—a relative comparison of OECD countries’ tax systems with respect to competitiveness and neutrality.

The International Tax Competitiveness Index (ITCI) seeks to measure the extent to which a country’s tax system adheres to two important aspects of tax policy: competitiveness and neutrality.

A competitive tax code is one that keeps marginal effective tax rates low. In today’s globalized world, capital is highly mobile. Businesses can choose to invest in any number of countries throughout the world to find the highest rate of return. This means that businesses will look for countries with lower tax rates on investment to maximize their after-tax rate of return. If a country’s tax rate is too high, it will drive investment elsewhere, leading to slower economic growth. In addition, high marginal tax rates can impede domestic investment and lead to tax avoidance.

According to research from the OECD, corporate taxes are most harmful for economic growth, with personal income taxes and consumption taxes being less harmful. Taxes on immovable property have the smallest impact on growth.

Separately, a neutral tax code is simply one that seeks to raise the most revenue with the fewest economic distortions. This means that it doesn’t favor consumption over saving, as happens with investment taxes and wealth taxes. It also means few or no targeted tax breaks for specific activities carried out by businesses or individuals.

As tax laws become more complex, they also become less neutral. If, in theory, the same taxes apply to all businesses and individuals, but the rules are such that large businesses or wealthy individuals can change their behavior to gain a tax advantage, this undermines the neutrality of a tax system.

A tax code that is competitive and neutral promotes sustainable economic growth and investment while raising sufficient revenue for government priorities.

There are many factors unrelated to taxes which affect a country’s economic performance. Nevertheless, taxes play an important role in the health of a country’s economy.

To measure whether a country’s tax system is neutral and competitive, the ITCI looks at more than 40 tax policy variables. These variables measure not only the level of tax rates, but also how taxes are structured. The Index looks at a country’s corporate taxes, individual income taxes, consumption taxes, property taxes, and the treatment of profits earned overseas. The ITCI gives a comprehensive overview of how developed countries’ tax codes compare, explains why certain tax codes stand out as good or bad models for reform, and provides important insight into how to think about tax policy.

Due to some data limitations, recent tax changes in some countries may not be reflected in this year’s version of the International Tax Competitiveness Index.

Property Taxes

Property taxes are government levies on the assets of an individual or business. The methods and intervals of collection vary widely among the types of property taxes.

See more

Estate and inheritance taxes, for example, are due upon the death of an individual and the passing of his or her estate to an heir, respectively. Taxes on real property, on the other hand, are paid at set intervals—often annually—on the value of taxable property such as land and real estate.

Many types of property taxes are highly distortive and add significant complexity for taxpayers. Estate and inheritance taxes create disincentives against additional work and saving, which damages productivity and output. Financial transaction taxes increase the cost of capital, which limits the flow of investment capital to its most efficient allocations. Taxes on wealth limit the capital available in the economy, which damages long-term economic growth and innovation.

Sound tax policy minimizes economic distortions. Except for taxes on land, most property taxes increase economic distortions and have long-term negative effects on the economy and its productivity.

The Property Taxes category has three subcategories: real property taxes, wealth and estate taxes, and capital and transaction taxes.

vs 2025 Rank Country Score (0–100) — bar length is score, color is rank Score
unchanged from 2025 1 Estonia 100.0
unchanged from 2025 2 Mexico 80.1
unchanged from 2025 3 Australia 78.3
unchanged from 2025 4 Latvia 77.4
unchanged from 2025 5 Czech Republic 75.5
up one place from 2025 6 Lithuania 74.7
down one place from 2025 7 Flag of Slovakia Slovak Republic 74.4
unchanged from 2025 8 New Zealand 73.7
unchanged from 2025 9 Sweden 72.3
unchanged from 2025 10 Israel 69.6
unchanged from 2025 11 Costa Rica 67.9
unchanged from 2025 12 Flag of Germany Germany 67.7
unchanged from 2025 13 Chile 64.9
up three places from 2025 14 Denmark 64.4
down one place from 2025 15 Luxembourg 64.3
down one place from 2025 16 Flag of Norway Norway 62.9
down one place from 2025 17 Austria 62.5
unchanged from 2025 18 Ireland 61.8
up one place from 2025 19 Portugal 60.7
up one place from 2025 20 Netherlands 60.7
down two places from 2025 21 Finland 60.4
unchanged from 2025 22 Flag of Turkey Turkey 57.3
unchanged from 2025 23 Hungary 57.0
unchanged from 2025 24 Slovenia 54.4
unchanged from 2025 25 Flag of Canada Canada 54.0
unchanged from 2025 26 Japan 50.2
unchanged from 2025 27 United States 45.6
unchanged from 2025 28 Belgium 44.2
unchanged from 2025 29 Poland 43.2
unchanged from 2025 30 Greece 42.4
unchanged from 2025 31 Korea 42.0
unchanged from 2025 32 France 40.3
unchanged from 2025 33 United Kingdom 38.7
unchanged from 2025 34 Iceland 37.7
unchanged from 2025 35 Spain 36.5
unchanged from 2025 36 Switzerland 36.4
unchanged from 2025 37 Colombia 35.9
unchanged from 2025 38 Italy 31.9

Subcategory Breakdown

How each of the 38 countries scores on the parts that make up its property taxes score. Select a country to see its breakdown in detail.

Rank Country Score Real Property Taxes Wealth/Estate Taxes Capital/Transaction Taxes
#1 Estonia 100.0
#1 100.0
#1 100.0
#1 100.0
#2 Mexico 80.1
#5 74.1
#1 100.0
#6 79.1
#3 Australia 78.3
#2 81.2
#1 100.0
#14 63.8
#4 Latvia 77.4
#16 68.7
#1 100.0
#6 79.1
#5 Czech Republic 75.5
#7 73.2
#12 70.4
#1 100.0
#6 Lithuania 74.7
#11 71.6
#12 70.4
#1 100.0
#7 Flag of Slovakia Slovak Republic 74.4
#14 69.4
#1 100.0
#13 69.2
#8 New Zealand 73.7
#31 46.5
#1 100.0
#1 100.0
#9 Sweden 72.3
#15 69.0
#1 100.0
#14 63.8
#10 Israel 69.6
#29 52.9
#1 100.0
#6 79.1
#11 Costa Rica 67.9
#13 70.8
#1 100.0
#24 48.3
#12 Flag of Germany Germany 67.7
#9 72.0
#12 70.4
#6 79.1
#13 Chile 64.9
#23 62.4
#12 70.4
#5 84.7
#14 Denmark 64.4
#20 65.2
#12 70.4
#6 79.1
#15 Luxembourg 64.3
#3 75.6
#12 70.4
#14 63.8
#16 Flag of Norway Norway 62.9
#8 72.4
#32 57.4
#6 79.1
#17 Austria 62.5
#30 49.1
#1 100.0
#14 63.8
#18 Ireland 61.8
#12 70.8
#12 70.4
#22 63.6
#19 Portugal 60.7
#17 68.4
#12 70.4
#14 63.8
#20 Netherlands 60.7
#18 68.3
#12 70.4
#14 63.8
#21 Finland 60.4
#19 68.0
#12 70.4
#22 63.6
#22 Flag of Turkey Turkey 57.3
#6 73.7
#12 70.4
#31 46.2
#23 Hungary 57.0
#10 71.6
#12 70.4
#24 48.3
#24 Slovenia 54.4
#32 44.8
#12 70.4
#6 79.1
#25 Flag of Canada Canada 54.0
#33 43.9
#1 100.0
#29 46.4
#26 Japan 50.2
#25 59.2
#12 70.4
#29 46.4
#27 United States 45.6
#36 37.6
#12 70.4
#14 63.8
#28 Belgium 44.2
#24 62.2
#33 49.1
#24 48.3
#29 Poland 43.2
#26 55.6
#12 70.4
#36 31.0
#30 Greece 42.4
#27 54.2
#12 70.4
#36 31.0
#31 Korea 42.0
#34 42.6
#12 70.4
#31 46.2
#32 France 40.3
#28 54.1
#33 49.1
#24 48.3
#33 United Kingdom 38.7
#37 34.5
#12 70.4
#24 48.3
#34 Iceland 37.7
#38 21.6
#12 70.4
#14 63.8
#35 Spain 36.5
#21 64.6
#36 27.8
#31 46.2
#36 Switzerland 36.4
#4 74.9
#36 27.8
#36 31.0
#37 Colombia 35.9
#22 63.2
#36 27.8
#31 46.2
#38 Italy 31.9
#35 38.6
#33 49.1
#31 46.2

Source: 2026 International Tax Competitiveness Index.

Share This Tool

About the Authors

Alex Mengden Tax Foundation
Expert

Alex Mengden

Economist

Alex Mengden is an Economist at the Tax Foundation, where he focuses on international tax issues and tax policy in Europe. He holds a BA in philosophy and economics from the University of Bayreuth and an MSc in economics from the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.

Tax Foundation Staff

Luis Zarka

Transatlantic Tax Fellow

Luis Zarka was a 2026 Transatlantic Tax Fellow with the Tax Foundation’s Center for Global Tax Policy.

Media Contacts

Sarah Wilbur Tax Foundation Media Relations Contact

Sarah Wilbur

Communications Manager

Sarah Wilbur is Communications Manager at the Tax Foundation where she advances the organization’s institutional reach by developing its corporate communications and media programs.

Jesse Solis Tax Foundation

Jesse Solis

Vice President of Communications

Jesse Solis is Vice President of Communications at the Tax Foundation, where he leads the communications team and works to build coverage of Tax Foundation’s experts and their work across the globe. He joined the team in 2021 as Communications Manager and became Communications Director in 2024.