Skip to content

2026 International Tax Competitiveness Index

The structure of a country’s tax code is a determining factor of its economic performance. A well-structured tax code is easy for taxpayers to comply with and can promote economic development while raising sufficient revenue for a government’s priorities. In contrast, poorly structured tax systems can be costly, distort economic decision-making, and harm domestic economies.

Many countries have recognized this and have reformed their tax codes. Over the past few decades, marginal tax rates on corporate and individual income have declined significantly across the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Now, most OECD nations raise a significant amount of revenue from broad-based taxes such as payroll taxes and value-added taxes (VAT).

Not all recent changes in tax policy among OECD countries have improved the structure of tax systems; some had a negative impact. Though some countries, like Austria, have reduced their corporate income tax rates by several percentage points, others, like France, the Slovak Republic, and Slovenia, have increased them. Corporate tax base improvements have occurred in Canada, Germany, Lithuania, the United Kingdom, and the United States, while the corporate tax base has been made less competitive in the Czech Republic and Slovenia. Germany and Finland are phasing out temporary improvements to their corporate tax bases that Lithuania, the United Kingdom, and the United States have made permanent and expanded.

In recent years, tax policy has increasingly drifted away from its traditional roles of raising government revenue and encouraging investment into the toolbox of international tax and trade disputes, with import tariffs, digital service levies, and extraterritorial taxes deployed to exert economic pressure. In this environment, policymakers should refocus on neutral, internationally competitive tax policies that raise revenue with minimal harm to investment and economic growth. The variety of approaches to taxation among OECD countries creates a need to evaluate these systems relative to each other. For that purpose, we have developed the International Tax Competitiveness Index—a relative comparison of OECD countries’ tax systems with respect to competitiveness and neutrality.

The International Tax Competitiveness Index (ITCI) seeks to measure the extent to which a country’s tax system adheres to two important aspects of tax policy: competitiveness and neutrality.

A competitive tax code is one that keeps marginal effective tax rates low. In today’s globalized world, capital is highly mobile. Businesses can choose to invest in any number of countries throughout the world to find the highest rate of return. This means that businesses will look for countries with lower tax rates on investment to maximize their after-tax rate of return. If a country’s tax rate is too high, it will drive investment elsewhere, leading to slower economic growth. In addition, high marginal tax rates can impede domestic investment and lead to tax avoidance.

According to research from the OECD, corporate taxes are most harmful for economic growth, with personal income taxes and consumption taxes being less harmful. Taxes on immovable property have the smallest impact on growth.

Separately, a neutral tax code is simply one that seeks to raise the most revenue with the fewest economic distortions. This means that it doesn’t favor consumption over saving, as happens with investment taxes and wealth taxes. It also means few or no targeted tax breaks for specific activities carried out by businesses or individuals.

As tax laws become more complex, they also become less neutral. If, in theory, the same taxes apply to all businesses and individuals, but the rules are such that large businesses or wealthy individuals can change their behavior to gain a tax advantage, this undermines the neutrality of a tax system.

A tax code that is competitive and neutral promotes sustainable economic growth and investment while raising sufficient revenue for government priorities.

There are many factors unrelated to taxes which affect a country’s economic performance. Nevertheless, taxes play an important role in the health of a country’s economy.

To measure whether a country’s tax system is neutral and competitive, the ITCI looks at more than 40 tax policy variables. These variables measure not only the level of tax rates, but also how taxes are structured. The Index looks at a country’s corporate taxes, individual income taxes, consumption taxes, property taxes, and the treatment of profits earned overseas. The ITCI gives a comprehensive overview of how developed countries’ tax codes compare, explains why certain tax codes stand out as good or bad models for reform, and provides important insight into how to think about tax policy.

Due to some data limitations, recent tax changes in some countries may not be reflected in this year’s version of the International Tax Competitiveness Index.

Corporate Taxes

The corporate income tax is a direct tax on the profits of a corporation. All OECD countries levy a tax on corporate profits, but the tax rates and bases vary significantly across countries.

See more

Corporate income taxes reduce the after-tax rate of return on corporate investment. This increases the cost of capital, which leads to lower levels of investment and economic output. Additionally, the corporate tax can lead to lower wages for workers, lower returns for investors, and higher prices for consumers.

Although the corporate income tax has a relatively significant impact on a country’s economy, it raises a relatively low amount of tax revenue for most governments—the OECD average was 11.9 percent of total revenues in 2023.

The ITCI breaks the corporate income tax category into three subcategories: the corporate rate, cost recovery, and incentives and complexity.

vs 2025 Rank Country Score (0–100) — bar length is score, color is rank Score
unchanged from 2025 1 Latvia 100.0
unchanged from 2025 2 Estonia 96.0
unchanged from 2025 3 Lithuania 84.8
unchanged from 2025 4 Ireland 81.8
unchanged from 2025 5 Hungary 79.0
unchanged from 2025 6 Sweden 75.5
unchanged from 2025 7 Switzerland 75.2
up two places from 2025 8 United States 74.2
unchanged from 2025 9 Czech Republic 73.1
down two places from 2025 10 Finland 72.3
unchanged from 2025 11 Israel 70.3
unchanged from 2025 12 Poland 70.2
up two places from 2025 13 Iceland 69.0
down one place from 2025 14 Slovenia 68.8
down one place from 2025 15 Flag of Norway Norway 68.7
unchanged from 2025 16 Belgium 67.4
unchanged from 2025 17 Flag of Canada Canada 66.7
unchanged from 2025 18 Austria 66.4
unchanged from 2025 19 Denmark 65.2
unchanged from 2025 20 Luxembourg 64.6
unchanged from 2025 21 Flag of Turkey Turkey 63.0
unchanged from 2025 22 Greece 62.6
up one place from 2025 23 Netherlands 61.7
up one place from 2025 24 Flag of Slovakia Slovak Republic 60.8
up one place from 2025 25 United Kingdom 59.3
down three places from 2025 26 Korea 59.3
unchanged from 2025 27 Italy 59.1
unchanged from 2025 28 Mexico 57.8
unchanged from 2025 29 Australia 56.3
unchanged from 2025 30 Flag of Germany Germany 55.1
unchanged from 2025 31 New Zealand 54.4
unchanged from 2025 32 Chile 52.4
unchanged from 2025 33 Spain 52.3
up one place from 2025 34 Portugal 50.5
down one place from 2025 35 Costa Rica 48.9
unchanged from 2025 36 Japan 43.1
unchanged from 2025 37 Colombia 41.5
unchanged from 2025 38 France 28.9

Subcategory Breakdown

How each of the 38 countries scores on the parts that make up its corporate taxes score. Select a country to see its breakdown in detail.

Rank Country Score Rate Cost Recovery Incentives/Complexity
#1 Latvia 100.0
#6 66.2
#1 100.0
#1 100.0
#2 Estonia 96.0
#11 60.0
#1 100.0
#2 98.5
#3 Lithuania 84.8
#3 75.4
#3 67.9
#25 74.4
#4 Ireland 81.8
#2 89.2
#27 37.5
#20 76.8
#5 Hungary 79.0
#1 100.0
#37 33.1
#36 53.8
#6 Sweden 75.5
#9 64.4
#19 44.9
#5 93.6
#7 Switzerland 75.2
#5 67.8
#13 49.1
#14 81.2
#8 United States 74.2
#24 49.2
#4 64.7
#6 92.9
#9 Czech Republic 73.1
#10 63.1
#24 43.2
#7 90.1
#10 Finland 72.3
#6 66.2
#34 33.6
#4 93.8
#11 Israel 70.3
#16 57.0
#10 51.3
#12 82.8
#12 Poland 70.2
#4 69.3
#14 48.9
#33 63.0
#13 Iceland 69.0
#6 66.2
#23 43.2
#29 71.6
#14 Slovenia 68.8
#11 60.0
#26 37.6
#9 89.1
#15 Flag of Norway Norway 68.7
#11 60.0
#29 37.0
#8 89.5
#16 Belgium 67.4
#20 50.8
#7 54.4
#16 81.0
#17 Flag of Canada Canada 66.7
#26 47.8
#6 55.2
#11 83.5
#18 Austria 66.4
#16 57.0
#12 50.2
#28 71.9
#19 Denmark 65.2
#11 60.0
#28 37.2
#18 78.4
#20 Luxembourg 64.6
#18 54.3
#15 48.5
#27 73.2
#21 Flag of Turkey Turkey 63.0
#20 50.8
#17 47.8
#22 75.2
#22 Greece 62.6
#11 60.0
#33 33.6
#24 74.6
#23 Netherlands 61.7
#25 48.4
#18 46.2
#19 77.7
#24 Flag of Slovakia Slovak Republic 60.8
#19 53.9
#22 43.3
#30 68.2
#25 United Kingdom 59.3
#20 50.8
#20 44.4
#31 67.9
#26 Korea 59.3
#28 43.1
#11 50.4
#23 74.6
#27 Italy 59.1
#29 42.2
#5 57.7
#32 66.8
#28 Mexico 57.8
#33 35.5
#25 40.6
#3 95.7
#29 Australia 56.3
#33 35.5
#21 43.4
#10 87.5
#30 Flag of Germany Germany 55.1
#36 35.1
#9 52.1
#26 74.0
#31 New Zealand 54.4
#30 41.6
#35 33.4
#13 82.6
#32 Chile 52.4
#27 44.7
#38 24.9
#15 81.1
#33 Spain 52.3
#20 50.8
#31 35.6
#34 56.7
#34 Portugal 50.5
#31 37.0
#8 53.5
#35 54.1
#35 Costa Rica 48.9
#33 35.5
#36 33.4
#21 76.3
#36 Japan 43.1
#32 36.3
#30 36.3
#37 53.4
#37 Colombia 41.5
#37 20.1
#32 33.6
#17 80.8
#38 France 28.9
#38 16.6
#16 48.1
#38 30.2

Source: 2026 International Tax Competitiveness Index.

Share This Tool

About the Authors

Alex Mengden Tax Foundation
Expert

Alex Mengden

Economist

Alex Mengden is an Economist at the Tax Foundation, where he focuses on international tax issues and tax policy in Europe. He holds a BA in philosophy and economics from the University of Bayreuth and an MSc in economics from the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.

Tax Foundation Staff

Luis Zarka

Transatlantic Tax Fellow

Luis Zarka was a 2026 Transatlantic Tax Fellow with the Tax Foundation’s Center for Global Tax Policy.

Media Contacts

Sarah Wilbur Tax Foundation Media Relations Contact

Sarah Wilbur

Communications Manager

Sarah Wilbur is Communications Manager at the Tax Foundation where she advances the organization’s institutional reach by developing its corporate communications and media programs.

Jesse Solis Tax Foundation

Jesse Solis

Vice President of Communications

Jesse Solis is Vice President of Communications at the Tax Foundation, where he leads the communications team and works to build coverage of Tax Foundation’s experts and their work across the globe. He joined the team in 2021 as Communications Manager and became Communications Director in 2024.