Skip to content

2026 International Tax Competitiveness Index

The structure of a country’s tax code is a determining factor of its economic performance. A well-structured tax code is easy for taxpayers to comply with and can promote economic development while raising sufficient revenue for a government’s priorities. In contrast, poorly structured tax systems can be costly, distort economic decision-making, and harm domestic economies.

Many countries have recognized this and have reformed their tax codes. Over the past few decades, marginal tax rates on corporate and individual income have declined significantly across the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Now, most OECD nations raise a significant amount of revenue from broad-based taxes such as payroll taxes and value-added taxes (VAT).

Not all recent changes in tax policy among OECD countries have improved the structure of tax systems; some had a negative impact. Though some countries, like Austria, have reduced their corporate income tax rates by several percentage points, others, like France, the Slovak Republic, and Slovenia, have increased them. Corporate tax base improvements have occurred in Canada, Germany, Lithuania, the United Kingdom, and the United States, while the corporate tax base has been made less competitive in the Czech Republic and Slovenia. Germany and Finland are phasing out temporary improvements to their corporate tax bases that Lithuania, the United Kingdom, and the United States have made permanent and expanded.

In recent years, tax policy has increasingly drifted away from its traditional roles of raising government revenue and encouraging investment into the toolbox of international tax and trade disputes, with import tariffs, digital service levies, and extraterritorial taxes deployed to exert economic pressure. In this environment, policymakers should refocus on neutral, internationally competitive tax policies that raise revenue with minimal harm to investment and economic growth. The variety of approaches to taxation among OECD countries creates a need to evaluate these systems relative to each other. For that purpose, we have developed the International Tax Competitiveness Index—a relative comparison of OECD countries’ tax systems with respect to competitiveness and neutrality.

The International Tax Competitiveness Index (ITCI) seeks to measure the extent to which a country’s tax system adheres to two important aspects of tax policy: competitiveness and neutrality.

A competitive tax code is one that keeps marginal effective tax rates low. In today’s globalized world, capital is highly mobile. Businesses can choose to invest in any number of countries throughout the world to find the highest rate of return. This means that businesses will look for countries with lower tax rates on investment to maximize their after-tax rate of return. If a country’s tax rate is too high, it will drive investment elsewhere, leading to slower economic growth. In addition, high marginal tax rates can impede domestic investment and lead to tax avoidance.

According to research from the OECD, corporate taxes are most harmful for economic growth, with personal income taxes and consumption taxes being less harmful. Taxes on immovable property have the smallest impact on growth.

Separately, a neutral tax code is simply one that seeks to raise the most revenue with the fewest economic distortions. This means that it doesn’t favor consumption over saving, as happens with investment taxes and wealth taxes. It also means few or no targeted tax breaks for specific activities carried out by businesses or individuals.

As tax laws become more complex, they also become less neutral. If, in theory, the same taxes apply to all businesses and individuals, but the rules are such that large businesses or wealthy individuals can change their behavior to gain a tax advantage, this undermines the neutrality of a tax system.

A tax code that is competitive and neutral promotes sustainable economic growth and investment while raising sufficient revenue for government priorities.

There are many factors unrelated to taxes which affect a country’s economic performance. Nevertheless, taxes play an important role in the health of a country’s economy.

To measure whether a country’s tax system is neutral and competitive, the ITCI looks at more than 40 tax policy variables. These variables measure not only the level of tax rates, but also how taxes are structured. The Index looks at a country’s corporate taxes, individual income taxes, consumption taxes, property taxes, and the treatment of profits earned overseas. The ITCI gives a comprehensive overview of how developed countries’ tax codes compare, explains why certain tax codes stand out as good or bad models for reform, and provides important insight into how to think about tax policy.

Due to some data limitations, recent tax changes in some countries may not be reflected in this year’s version of the International Tax Competitiveness Index.

Overall Rankings

vs 2025 Rank Country Score
unchanged from 2025 1 Estonia 100.0
unchanged from 2025 2 Latvia 92.5
unchanged from 2025 3 New Zealand 88.2
unchanged from 2025 4 Switzerland 86.8
unchanged from 2025 5 Lithuania 82.6
unchanged from 2025 6 Luxembourg 81.9
up one place from 2025 7 Czech Republic 79.4
down one place from 2025 8 Australia 78.9
up two places from 2025 9 Turkey 76.0
unchanged from 2025 10 Hungary 75.6
up two places from 2025 11 Israel 75.1
down three places from 2025 12 Slovak Republic 74.7
down one place from 2025 13 Sweden 74.6
unchanged from 2025 14 Costa Rica 73.3
unchanged from 2025 15 Canada 72.2
up one place from 2025 16 Netherlands 71.6
down one place from 2025 17 United States 71.2
unchanged from 2025 18 Austria 70.9
unchanged from 2025 19 Germany 69.2
unchanged from 2025 20 Norway 67.5
unchanged from 2025 21 Mexico 66.9
unchanged from 2025 22 Finland 66.2
unchanged from 2025 23 Greece 65.9
unchanged from 2025 24 Chile 65.2
unchanged from 2025 25 Slovenia 64.5
up one place from 2025 26 Korea 63.8
down one place from 2025 27 Belgium 63.5
unchanged from 2025 28 Japan 62.3
up one place from 2025 29 Ireland 62.2
up one place from 2025 30 United Kingdom 61.9
down two places from 2025 31 Denmark 61.6
unchanged from 2025 32 Poland 61.2
unchanged from 2025 33 Portugal 59.6
unchanged from 2025 34 Iceland 59.0
unchanged from 2025 35 Spain 57.5
unchanged from 2025 36 Italy 50.8
unchanged from 2025 37 Colombia 47.3
unchanged from 2025 38 France 45.7

Notable Changes from 2025

Canada

unchanged from 2025 #15 overall

In 2025, Canada abolished its digital services tax, canceled the planned increase in the capital gains inclusion rate, and reinstated full expensing for machinery and the accelerated investment incentive for buildings. In September 2026, after the cut-off date for the current Index edition, the Canadian government announced it would make full expensing for machinery and patent rights permanent and extend it to a larger share of assets, while introducing temporary full expensing for buildings used for manufacturing and processing until 2029. Canada’s rank stays constant at 15th.

View profile for Canada →

Denmark

down two places from 2025 #31 overall

Denmark added a new personal income tax bracket in 2026, increasing its top rate from 55.9 to 60.5 percent and raising the top rate threshold from around 1.2 to 5.3 times the average salary. Denmark’s rank fell from 29th to 31st.

View profile for Denmark →

Finland

unchanged from 2025 #22 overall

In 2026, Finland phased out accelerated depreciation for machinery and equipment, reducing the share of investment costs that businesses can recover by 10 percentage points in real terms. However, it also reduced its top rate on personal income from 57 to 50.4 percent. Finland kept its rank at 22nd.

View profile for Finland →

Lithuania

unchanged from 2025 #5 overall

Lithuania raised its corporate tax rate from 16 to 17 percent while substantially improving the competitiveness of its corporate tax base by introducing permanent full expensing for machinery, equipment, and intangible rights. Lithuania also broadened its VAT base. Lithuania ranks 5th, the same as last year.

View profile for Lithuania →

Portugal

unchanged from 2025 #33 overall

Portugal has made several improvements to its personal and corporate tax regimes over the last years, reducing its tax rate on long-term capital gains from 28 to 19.6 percent and making its notional interest deduction more generous in 2025. Portugal continued to incrementally reduce its top corporate tax rate from 31.5 in 2024 to 30.5 percent in 2025, further down to 29.5 percent in 2026. Portugal’s rank is 33rd, the same as last year.

View profile for Portugal →

Slovak Republic

down three places from 2025 #12 overall

In 2025, the Slovak Republic increased its corporate rate from 21 to 24 percent, increased its VAT registration threshold, and introduced a financial transaction tax. In 2026, it raised its top personal income tax rate from 35 to 44.4 percent and raised the top rate threshold. The Slovak Republic’s rank continues to fall, from 9th to 12th.

View profile for Slovak Republic →

United States

down one place from 2025 #17 overall

In 2025, the US reinstated full expensing for plants and equipment and extended the policy to selected industrial buildings and structures. From 2026, the US is tightening its cross-border rules by abolishing the substance exclusion for income of US multinationals earned abroad. The US rank fell back again from 16th to 17th.

View profile for United States →

Last year's scores shown here can differ from previously published rankings due to both methodological changes and corrections made to previous years' data.

How All 38 Countries Rank

Each country's overall rank and its rank in each of the five categories. Select a country to see its profile.

Overall and category ranks for all 38 countries
CountryOverallCorporateIndividualConsumptionPropertyCross-border
Estonia#1#2#1#24#1#7
Latvia#2#1#8#22#4#6
New Zealand#3#31#7#1#8#14
Switzerland#4#7#9#4#36#2
Lithuania#5#3#10#23#6#16
Luxembourg#6#20#21#7#15#5
Czech Republic#7#9#4#32#5#11
Australia#8#29#14#9#3#23
Turkey#9#21#6#15#22#8
Hungary#10#5#3#38#23#4
Israel#11#11#31#11#10#18
Slovak Republic#12#24#2#33#7#17
Sweden#13#6#18#26#9#12
Costa Rica#14#35#13#6#11#29
Canada#15#17#28#8#25#28
Netherlands#16#23#30#14#20#3
United States#17#8#17#3#27#37
Austria#18#18#27#17#17#10
Germany#19#30#34#13#12#9
Norway#20#15#29#27#16#15
Mexico#21#28#26#12#2#38
Finland#22#10#24#28#21#24
Greece#23#22#5#29#30#19
Chile#24#32#23#10#13#36
Slovenia#25#14#12#30#24#30
Korea#26#26#38#2#31#34
Belgium#27#16#15#25#28#21
Japan#28#36#35#5#26#31
Ireland#29#4#36#35#18#27
United Kingdom#30#25#22#34#33#1
Denmark#31#19#37#20#14#32
Poland#32#12#11#36#29#25
Portugal#33#34#19#21#19#33
Iceland#34#13#32#19#34#26
Spain#35#33#20#18#35#20
Italy#36#27#16#37#38#22
Colombia#37#37#25#16#37#35
France#38#38#33#31#32#13

Source: 2026 International Tax Competitiveness Index.

Europe at a Glance

Among European OECD members, Estonia ranks highest (1st overall) and France ranks lowest (38th overall) on the overall index.

Source: 2026 International Tax Competitiveness Index.

Share This Tool

About the Authors

Alex Mengden Tax Foundation
Expert

Alex Mengden

Economist

Alex Mengden is an Economist at the Tax Foundation, where he focuses on international tax issues and tax policy in Europe. He holds a BA in philosophy and economics from the University of Bayreuth and an MSc in economics from the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.

Tax Foundation Staff

Luis Zarka

Transatlantic Tax Fellow

Luis Zarka was a 2026 Transatlantic Tax Fellow with the Tax Foundation’s Center for Global Tax Policy.

Media Contacts

Sarah Wilbur Tax Foundation Media Relations Contact

Sarah Wilbur

Communications Manager

Sarah Wilbur is Communications Manager at the Tax Foundation where she advances the organization’s institutional reach by developing its corporate communications and media programs.

Jesse Solis Tax Foundation

Jesse Solis

Vice President of Communications

Jesse Solis is Vice President of Communications at the Tax Foundation, where he leads the communications team and works to build coverage of Tax Foundation’s experts and their work across the globe. He joined the team in 2021 as Communications Manager and became Communications Director in 2024.