Skip to content

Tracking the Impact of the Trump Tariffs & Trade War

57 min readBy: Erica York, Alex Durante

 

Key Findings

  • In 2025, the Trump tariffs amounted to an average taxA tax is a mandatory payment or charge collected by local, state, and national governments from individuals or businesses to cover the costs of general government services, goods, and activities. increase of $1,000 per US household. We estimate that the tariffs both announced and imposed, including the  Section 122 tariffTariffs are taxes imposed by one country on goods imported from another country. Tariffs are trade barriers that raise prices, reduce available quantities of goods and services for US businesses and consumers, and create an economic burden on foreign exporters., Section 232 tariffs, Section 301 tariffs, and Section 338 tariff on Canada, will increase taxes per US household by $900 in 2026.
  • President Trump imposed tariffs on nearly all trading partners under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and on several sectors using Section 232. On February 20,2026, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that IEEPA does not authorize tariffs, leaving only the new Section 232 tariffs in place. Trump responded by imposing a 10 percent tariff on nearly all countries under Section 122, effective February 24, 2026, applying to an estimated $1.0 trillion (29 percent) of annual imports. The Section 122 tariff expired after 150 days on July 24. The new Section 301 tariffs apply to an estimated $949 billion (28 percent) of annual imports.
  • The IEEPA ruling reduced the weighted average applied tariff rate on all imports from 14.9 percent to 8.2 percent in 2026 under the remaining Section 232 tariffs. The revised Section 232 tariffs on steel, aluminum, and copper and the Section 122 tariff increased this rate to 10.8 percent. After the Section 122 tariff expires, accounting for  the additional tariffs that will come into effect (Section 232 tariffs on pharmaceuticals, Section 301 tariffs, and the Section 338 tariff on Canada), the weighted average applied tariff rate rises to 11.8 percent.
  • The average effective tariff rate was in 2025—the highest since 1947. We estimate the average effective tariff rate will be 6.6 percent for calendar year 2026, the highest since 1969.
  • We estimate that the  tariffs will raise $1.6 trillion in revenue from 2026-2035 on a conventional basis. The Section 232 tariffs, Section 301 tariffs, and Section 338 tariff on Canada will reduce long-run US GDP by 0.4 percent.
  • Accounting for negative economic effects, the revenue raised by the tariffs falls to $1.2 trillion over the decade.
  • The tariffs have not meaningfully altered the trade balance, which fell by only $2.1 billion in 2025, driven by an increase in the trade surplus of services.

Average Tariff Rates

The new tariffs will significantly raise the tariff rates the US applies to most imports. The weighted average tariff rate measures the statutory tax rate that applies to US imports. It differs from the average effective tariff rate that measures actual customs duties collections as a share of actual goods imports.

According to the World Bank, the weighted average applied tariff was 1.5 percent in 2022. Prior to the Supreme Court’s Learning Resources decision, we estimate US imports faced a weighted-average applied tariff rate of 15.2 percent. While the 10 percent Section 122 tariffs are in effect, we estimate the applied rate is 10.8 percent, and that it will rise to 11.8 percent after the Section 122 tariff expires and the announced Section 232 tariff on pharmaceuticals, Section 301 tariffs, and Section 338 tariff on Canada go into effect.

Since the beginning of President Trump’s second term, US tariff policy has changed more than 50 times. The applied tariff rate peaked in April 2025, shortly after the “Liberation Day” tariffs, and has fluctuated significantly since then.

We estimate the average effective tariff rate by taking tariff revenues as a share of total goods imports. Based on actual customs duties collections and import levels in 2025, the actual average effective , up from 2.4 percent in 2024, reaching its highest level since 1947. We estimate the average effective tariff rate for 2026 will be 6.6 percent—the highest since 1969.

Tariff Revenue Collections

In calendar year 2025, customs duties raised $264 billion for the federal government, compared to $79 billion in calendar year 2024. Total customs duties revenues include pre-existing tariffs, such as those President Trump imposed in his first term. With the IEEPA tariffs being ruled illegal, the approximately $166 billion of revenue collected by the government related to those tariffs will have to be refunded. The total revenue raised by tariffs will be less than the direct collections, because tariffs mechanically reduce the bases of income and payroll taxes. We estimate the government netted $38 billion from the new Section 232 tariffs in 2025.

The Balance of Trade

One of President Trump’s stated goals of imposing tariffs is to shrink the US trade deficit. However, a country’s balance of trade is not solely driven by trade policy, but instead, reflects broader macroeconomic balances between saving and investment and net lending and borrowing with the rest of the world.

In the United States, domestic investment outpaces domestic saving, requiring a capital inflow from the rest of the world to close the gap. The capital inflow represents net lending to the United States from the rest of the world to finance business investment as well as the government’s budget deficit. Because tariffs do not directly change the balance between domestic saving and investment, tariffs cannot permanently change the trade balance.

The last time the United States ran a trade surplus was in 1975; every year since, the United States has run a trade deficit. That the United States has consistently run trade deficits for decades is not an imminent economic problem. Net imports, another term for a trade deficit, can reflect the strength of the US economy in attracting foreign investment and in serving as a safe, reliable haven for foreign capital. When net imports finance the capital stock, it allows the US to enjoy a higher level of productivity and growth than otherwise would occur.

In 2025, the trade deficit fell by just $2.1 billion compared to 2024. The reduction in the trade deficit was due to an increase in the trade surplus of services, as the goods deficit actually increased by $25.5 billion year over year.

Economic Effects

Our estimates below separate the effects of the IEEPA tariffs (ruled unlawful) from other tariffs. See the Appendix for a detailed explanation of the modeled provisions.

Because the Section 122 tariff expires after 150 days, it has no long-run economic impact in our model. We estimate that before accounting for any foreign retaliation, the Section 232 tariffs, Section 301 tariffs, and Section 338 tariff on Canada will reduce long-run US GDP by 0.4 percent.

As of September 1, 2025, threatened and imposed retaliatory tariffs affect $223 billion of US exports based on 2024 US import values; if fully imposed, we estimate they will reduce long-run US GDP by 0.2 percent.

Table 1. Estimated Economic Impact of 2025-2026 Trump Tariffs

Long-Run GDPCapital StockPre-Tax WagesHours Worked Converted to Full-Time Equivalent Jobs
Section 232 Tariffs-0.2%-0.2%0.0%-228,000
Section 232 Steel, Aluminum, Copper-0.1%-0.1%0.0%-100,000
Section 232 Autos and Auto Parts-0.1%-0.1%0.0%-85,000
Section 232 Heavy Trucks and PartsLess than -0.05%Less than -0.05%0.0%-17,000
Section 232 Furniture, Kitchen Cabinets and Vanities, LumberLess than -0.05%Less than -0.05%0.0%-3,000
Section 232 PharmaceuticalsLess than -0.05%Less than -0.05%0.0%-23,000
Section 301 Tariffs-0.1%-0.1%0.0%-133,000
Section 338 Tariff on Canada (50%)Less than -0.05%Less than -0.05%0.0%-6,000
Total-0.4%0.0%0.00%-367,000
Imposed Retaliation-0.2%-0.1%0.0%-141,000
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Source: Tax Foundation General Equilibrium Model, July 2026

Revenue Impacts

Tariffs generate tax revenue for the federal government. We model the imposed tariffs together, accounting for interactions between the different rounds of tariffs and timing of implementation. Additionally, we account for income and payroll taxA payroll tax is a tax paid on the wages and salaries of employees to finance social insurance programs like Social Security, Medicare, and unemployment insurance. Payroll taxes are social insurance taxes that comprise 24.8 percent of combined federal, state, and local government revenue, the second largest source of that combined tax revenue. offsets, as tariffs mechanically reduce those tax bases. For this reason, the total tax revenue raised on net will be less than the tariff revenue reported by Treasury.

The revenue generated by tariffs is lower on a dynamic basis, reflecting the negative effect tariffs have on US economic output, reducing incomes and resulting tax revenues. Revenue would fall more when factoring in foreign retaliation, as retaliation would cause US output and incomes to shrink further.

On a conventional basis, before incorporating negative economic effects, we estimate that the Section 232 tariffs will increase US federal tax revenue by $942 billion from 2026 through 2035. The temporary 10 percent Section 122 tariffs will raise $22 billion in 2026, . The Section 301 tariffs and the Section 338 tariff on Canada will raise an additional $648 billion from 2026 through 2035.

On a dynamic basis, incorporating the negative effects of the US-imposed tariffs on the US economy, we estimate that all of the tariffs will raise $1.2 trillion from 2026 through 2035, about $426 billion less than the conventional estimate. Incorporating the negative effects of imposed retaliatory tariffs as of September 1, 2025, further reduces 10-year revenue by $136 billion.

Table 2. Conventional Revenue Effects of 2025-2026 Trump Tariffs 

Calendar Year20262027202820292030203120322033203420352026-2035
Section 232 Tariffs$75.2$82.1$86.1$88.9$92.1$95.8$99.6$103.7$107.5$111.3$942.3
Section 232 Steel, Aluminum, Copper$31.5$32.4$34.9$36.0$37.3$38.8$40.4$42.0$43.6$45.1$382.0
Section 232 Autos and Auto Parts$32.5$33.7$34.8$35.9$37.2$38.7$40.2$41.9$43.4$44.9$383.2
Section 232 Heavy Trucks and Parts$6.9$7.2$7.4$7.6$7.9$8.2$8.5$8.9$9.2$9.5$81.3
Section 232 Furniture, Kitchen Cabinets and Vanities, Lumber$1.4$1.6$1.6$1.7$1.7$1.8$1.9$2.0$2.0$2.1$17.8
Section 232 Pharmaceuticals$2.9$7.2$7.4$7.7$7.9$8.3$8.6$9.0$9.3$9.6$77.9
Section 122 Tariff (10%)$21.6$0.0$0.0$0.0$0.0$0.0$0.0$0.0$0.0$0.0$21.6
Section 301 Tariffs$24.0$58.2$60.1$62.0$64.2$66.8$69.5$72.3$75.0$77.6$629.7
Section 338 Tariff on Canada (50%)$0.6$1.7$1.8$1.8$1.9$2.0$2.1$2.1$2.2$2.3$18.5
Total$121.4$142.0$148.0$152.7$158.2$164.6$171.1$178.2$184.7$191.2$1,612.1
Source: Tax Foundation General Equilibrium Model, July 2026

Table 3. Dynamic Revenue Effects of 2025-2026 Trump Tariffs

Calendar Year20262027202820292030203120322033203420352026-2035
Section 232 Tariffs$53.0$59.2$61.5$64.6$66.3$68.1$72.2$75.4$77.5$80.6$678.4
Section 232 Steel, Aluminum, Copper$21.8$22.4$24.1$25.2$25.8$26.7$28.3$29.6$30.2$31.6$265.7
Section 232 Autos and Auto Parts$24.0$25.0$25.5$26.8$27.4$28.3$29.8$31.3$32.0$33.4$283.5
Section 232 Heavy Trucks and Parts$5.1$5.3$5.4$5.7$6.0$5.9$6.3$6.6$6.9$7.1$60.3
Section 232 Furniture, Kithcen Cabinets and Vanities, Lumber$1.4$1.6$1.6$1.7$1.7$1.8$1.9$2.0$2.0$2.1$17.8
Section 232 Pharmaceuticals$0.7$4.9$4.9$5.3$5.5$5.4$5.9$5.9$6.3$6.4$51.2
Section 122 Tariff (10%)$21.6$0.0$0.0$0.0$0.0$0.0$0.0$0.0$0.0$0.0$21.6
Section 301 Tariffs$10.9$44.6$45.7$47.5$49.0$50.9$53.4$55.7$57.1$59.6$474.4
Section 338 Tariff on Canada (50%)$0.0$1.1$1.1$1.1$1.2$1.2$1.3$1.3$1.5$1.4$11.2
Total$85.6$105.0$108.3$113.3$116.5$120.2$126.9$132.4$136.1$141.6$1,185.9
Retaliation-$9.6-$10.8-$11.6-$12.5-$13.2-$14.0-$14.9-$15.6-$16.4-$17.4-$136.0
Source: Tax Foundation General Equilibrium Model, July 2026

We estimate that the newly imposed and scheduled tariffs will increase federal tax revenues by $121 billion in 2026, or 0.4 percent of GDP, ranking as the 19th largest tax increase since 1940.

Distributional Impacts

In 2026, the tariffs will reduce after-tax incomes for all income groups. The top 1 percent will see a smaller reduction in after-tax incomeAfter-tax income is the net amount of income available to invest, save, or consume after federal, state, and withholding taxes have been applied—your disposable income. Companies and, to a lesser extent, individuals, make economic decisions in light of how they can best maximize their earnings. compared to others.

In 2025, per US household, the IEEPA and Section 232 tariffs altogether amounted to an average tax increase of $1,000. However, with the IEEPA tariffs struck down and not yet fully replaced, the tax increases in 2026 will be smaller. We estimate the Section 232 tariffs will create an average tax burden of $600, and the other tariffs, including the expired Section 122 tariffs, increase it to $900 for 2026.

These averages do not capture additional costs from higher-priced alternatives and reduced consumer choice.

Table 4. Distributional Effects of 2025-2026 Trump Tariffs

Percent Change in After-Tax Income under Imposed Tariffs, 2026Nominal Tax Change, 2026
Market Income PercentileAll TariffsAll Tariffs
0% - 20.0%-0.8%$81
20.0% - 40.0%-0.8%$222
40.0% - 60.0%-0.8%$433
60.0% - 80.0%-0.8%$765
80.0% - 100%-0.7%$2,089
80.0% - 90.0%-0.8%$1,218
90.0% - 95.0%-0.8%$1,705
95.0% - 99.0%-0.8%$2,837
99.0% - 99.9%-0.7%$6,795
99.9% - 100%-0.5%$36,044
Note: Market income includes adjusted gross incomeFor individuals, gross income is the total of all income received from any source before taxes or deductions. It includes wages, salaries, tips, interest, dividends, capital gains, rental income, alimony, pensions, and other forms of income. For businesses, gross income (or gross profit) is the sum of total receipts or sales minus the cost of goods sold (COGS)—the direct costs of producing goods (AGI) plus 1) tax-exempt interest, 2) non-taxable Social Security income, 3) the employer share of payroll taxes, 4) imputed corporate tax liability, 5) employer-sponsored health insurance and other fringe benefits, 6) taxpayers’ imputed contributions to defined-contribution pension plans. Market income levels are adjusted for the number of exemptions reported on each return to make tax units more comparable. After-tax income is market income less: individual income taxAn individual income tax (or personal income tax) is levied on the wages, salaries, investments, or other forms of income an individual or household earns. The U.S. imposes a progressive income tax where rates increase with income. The Federal Income Tax was established in 1913 with the ratification of the 16th Amendment. Though barely 100 years old, individual income taxes are the largest source, corporate income taxA corporate income tax (CIT) is levied by federal and state governments on business profits. Many companies are not subject to the CIT because they are taxed as pass-through businesses, with income reportable under the individual income tax., payroll taxes, estate and gift taxA gift tax is a tax on the transfer of property by a living individual, without payment or a valuable exchange in return. The donor, not the recipient of the gift, is typically liable for the tax., custom duties, and excise taxes. The 2026 income break points by percentile are: 20%-$17,735; 40%-$38,572; 60%-$73,905; 80%-$130,661; 90%-$188,849; 95%-$266,968; 99%-$611,194. Tax units with negative market income and non-filers are excluded from the percentile groups but included in the totals.
Source: Tax Foundation General Equilibrium Model, July 2026

Share this resource: taxfoundation.org/trump-tariffs

Stay informed on the tax policies impacting you.

Subscribe to our free newsletter to get the latest tax data, news and analysis.

Subscribe
Share this article

About the Authors

Erica York Tax Foundation
Expert

Erica York

Senior Economist

Erica York is Senior Economist with Tax Foundation’s Center for Federal Tax Policy. Her analysis has been featured in The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, Politico, and other national and international media outlets.

Alex Durante Tax Foundation
Expert

Alex Durante

Senior Economist

Alex Durante is a Senior Economist at the Tax Foundation, working on federal tax policy and model development. Alex worked as a research assistant at the Federal Reserve Board and served as a staff economist on the Council of Economic Advisers.