Option 40:

Introduce a Wealth Tax

Topline Estimates

Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
0.0%
Gross National Product (GNP)
-0.1%
Full-Time Equivalent Jobs
0
Wage Rate
0.0%
Capital Stock
0.0%
Conventional Primary Deficit Change (10‑Yr)
-$1,506.9B
Dynamic Primary Deficit Change (10‑Yr)
-$1,506.9B
Dynamic Total Deficit Change (10‑Yr)
-$1,837.6B

Source: Tax Foundation General Equilibrium Model.

Wealth taxes are imposed on the market value of total assets minus the market value of total liabilities owned by households. In the US, comprehensive wealth taxes have never been implemented, while most European wealth taxes have been repealed due to administrative complexities and disappointing revenue gains.

Wealth taxes impose a heavier tax burden than may be apparent. For example, consider an investor who owns a long-term bond with a fixed rate of return of 5 percent each year. A 5 percent annual wealth tax would equal a 100 percent income tax rate because the wealth tax would take all this taxpayer’s capital income.

This option imposes a 5 percent annual tax on net wealth above $1 billion. A wealth tax rate this high would invite substantial avoidance behavior, significantly reducing the revenue potential of the tax with an estimated avoidance rate of approximately 33 percent. It would also discourage saving among high-income taxpayers, leading to significant declines in wealth from increased consumption.

Domestic saving would fall, but foreign investment into the US would increase, preventing a decline in output but causing more of the returns to American investment to flow to foreigners. The smaller budget deficit would reduce federal government borrowing as well as interest payments to foreigners, but GNP would still decline on net by 0.1 percent. A wealth tax would almost certainly have large transitional effects, including dramatic swings in foreign capital flows and the trade deficit. These estimates do not account for the increase in compliance costs that would result from a wealth tax regime.

On a conventional basis, this option would decrease the primary deficit by $1,506.9 billion over the budget window. Incorporating changes in interest costs, the publicly held debt-to-GDP ratio would be lower than baseline, reaching 167.1 percent by 2056.

A wealth tax would be concentrated on the top 0.1 percent of tax filers, decreasing this group’s after-tax income by nearly 10 percent in the long run.

Modeled Results

Explore All Reform Options

Browse, search, and sort every reform option in the guide.

About the Authors

Erica York Tax Foundation
Expert

Erica York

Vice President of Federal Tax Policy

Erica York is Vice President of Federal Tax Policy with Tax Foundation’s Center for Federal Tax Policy. Her analysis has been featured in The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, Politico, and other national and international media outlets.

Garrett Watson Tax Foundation
Expert

Garrett Watson

Director of Policy Analysis

Garrett Watson is Director of Policy Analysis at the Tax Foundation, where he conducts research on federal and state tax policy. His work has been featured in The Washington Post, The Atlantic, Politico, the Associated Press and other major outlets.

Huaqun Li Tax Foundation
Expert

Huaqun Li

Senior Economist, Director of Modeling Projects

Dr. Huaqun Li is Senior Economist, Director of Modeling Projects at the Tax Foundation. She focuses on developing and maintaining the Foundation’s Taxes and Growth Model, which models the budgetary and economic effects of changes to federal tax policy.

William McBride or Will McBride Tax Foundation
Expert

William McBride

Chief Economist & Stephen J. Entin Fellow in Economics

Dr. William McBride is the Chief Economist & Stephen J. Entin Fellow in Economics at the Tax Foundation, where he oversees major research projects primarily related to reforming the federal tax code, advancing sound tax policy, and improving the federal government’s fiscal outlook.

Alex Durante Tax Foundation
Expert

Alex Durante

Senior Economist

Alex Durante is a Senior Economist at the Tax Foundation, working on federal tax policy and model development. Alex worked as a research assistant at the Federal Reserve Board and served as a staff economist on the Council of Economic Advisers.

Alex Muresianu Tax Foundation
Expert

Alex Muresianu

Senior Policy Analyst

Alex Muresianu is a Senior Policy Analyst at the Tax Foundation, focused on federal tax policy. Previously working on the federal team as an intern in the summer of 2018 and as a research assistant in summer 2020. He attended Tufts University, graduating with a degree in economics and minors in finance and political science.

Peter Van Ness Tax Foundation

Peter Van Ness

Research Software Developer

Peter Van Ness is a Research Software Developer at the Tax Foundation working on federal tax policy and model development. Peter previously worked as a research assistant at another think tank and as a data analyst at a consulting firm.

Aleksei Shilov Tax Foundation Research Software Developer

Aleksei Shilov

Research Software Developer

Aleksei Shilov is a Research Software developer at the Tax Foundation working on economic model development and federal tax policy. Aleksei joined the Tax Foundation as an intern in January 2025. He holds a B.S. in computer science and a minor in economics from Northeastern University and is currently based in Boston, MA.

Daniel Bunn Tax Foundation President & CEO
Expert

Daniel Bunn

President and CEO

Daniel Bunn is President and CEO of the Tax Foundation. Daniel has been with the organization since 2018 and, prior to becoming President, successfully built its Center for Global Tax Policy, expanding the Tax Foundation’s reach and impact around the world. Prior to joining the Tax Foundation, Daniel worked in the United States Senate at the Joint Economic Committee.