A Capital Gains Tax Would Be More Volatile than Washington State Revenue Projections Suggest
March 24, 2017
One Washington capital gains tax proposal is dead, but others are on the horizon. House Democratic leaders have signaled that a capital gains tax—which was also featured in Governor Jay Inslee’s budget proposal—will be part of their revenue package, chiefly as a means to increase education funding. In that vein, it’s instructive to consider the revenue implications of the Senate bill that was just set aside.
The most remarkable feature of the ten-year projections for SB 5111, which would impose a capital gains tax in Washington state, is how smooth and stable the revenues are. By the second year of the tax’s existence, projections show revenue increasing by a few percent per year, raising $933 million in fiscal year 2020 and gradually climbing to $1.21 billion by fiscal year 2027.
There is little one can say with confidence about capital gains tax revenue. The only thing we can be reasonably sure of is that it won’t look anything like this.
Of course, this is not a criticism of the state’s Department of Revenue or Office of Fiscal Management. The fiscal office has to shoot for an average and assume relatively smooth realizations, even though this will represent a significant departure from reality. As they explained while scoring a previous capital gains tax bill, “Capital gains are extremely volatile from year to year. Forecasted amounts in this fiscal note could be greatly over or understated.” There’s no way to know, prospectively, which years will see high and low capital realizations.
We can, however, pull back the curtain on the past. At the national level, the Congressional Budget Office maintains data on capital gains realizations in recent decades, and the reality is that capital gains and losses are highly volatile.
Here are the Office of Financial Management’s revenue projections for a Washington capital gains tax. Notice how smooth and consistent the projected growth is:
Capital gains realizations soared 91 percent in the tax reform year of 1986, then plummeted 55 percent the next year. Realizations slid 71 percent between 2007 and 2009. Other sources of tax revenue showed volatility in these years as well, but at nowhere near the intensity of capital gains.
Capital gains are taxed upon realization, meaning that you only owe the tax once you sell the asset. And of course, capital gains are offset by capital losses. In some years, many more people will be cutting their losses than taking their gains.
Even in the depths of recession, most people are drawing paychecks, and thus paying individual income taxes. They are making purchases subject to the sales tax. Assessed property values may decline, but property taxes continue to flow. Capital gains are different. In a bad year they all but vanish, making taxes on them remarkably unstable. Other states include capital gains in their broader individual income tax base, but taxing only capital gains means accepting an enormous amount of variance and unpredictability in revenue, which arguably makes a capital gains tax a poor source of revenue for a priority like education.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback