New Jersey Senate President Predicts Property Tax Increase Despite Cap
December 15, 2010
New Jersey homeowners, already bearing a tremendous property tax burden, will not be happy to hear the recent prediction from Senate President Stephen Sweeney: He expects property taxes to rise by more than two percent next year.
Senate President Steve Sweeney told the New Jersey Business and Industry Association that businesses and homeowners can expect increases greater than 2 percent unless the economy improves dramatically. A stagnant economy means local governments collect less in taxes.
“If the economy turns around and you have growth in your tax base, you should be able to cover your costs,” Sweeney said. “The problem is, I don’t see growth in the economy.”
The Legislature approved and Gov. Chris Christie signed a 2 percent cap on property tax growth this year. Pension and health care costs are exempt. Those costs have been rising at double-digit rates per year.
County, local and school officials who will be forced to create a budget within the cap or seek voter approval to exceed it will face tough choices, including layoffs and service cuts, Assembly Speaker Sheila Oliver said.
“The 2 percent property tax cap will restrain and constrain the growth of property taxes at the local level,” she said. “It will not necessarily reduce property taxes.”
In 2009, New Jersey has the highest property taxes of any state by three different measures: dollar amount paid, as a percentage of home value, and as a percentage of income.
More on property taxes:
• State Business Tax Climate Index–Property Tax Index, 2006 – 2010, October 26, 2010
• Kail Padgitt of the Tax Foundation: Sales Taxes, Property Taxes & Tax Revenue Sources, September 15, 2010
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback