Michigan Tax Proposal on Ballot Next Week
April 28, 2015
A week from today, voters in Michigan will go to the polls to vote on Proposal 1, a constitutional amendment and “tie-barred” legislative tax package that would raise an additional $2 billion a year for transportation, education, and income supports. I wrote about the ballot initiative a few months ago, but with the vote just around the corner, and with updated revenue projections available, it’s worth taking one more look at what voters are being asked to ratify.
In addition to amending the state constitution to raise the state sales tax, Proposal 1 also triggers the enactment of a package of revenue and spending bills. Here are the key components in summary form, after which I’ll go into slightly further detail on each component:
|TAX COMPONENT||FY 2016||FY 2017||FY 2018|
|Sales Tax Increase||$1.43 billion||$1.47 billion||$1.52 billion|
|Gas Tax Increase||$463.3 million||$418.6 million||$602.2 million|
|Affiliate Nexus||$60.0 million||$62.0 million||$63.9 million|
|Vehicle Registration||$60.9 million||$91.0 million||$112.0 million|
|Low-Income Supports||$0.0 million||($261.1 million)||($267.7 million)|
|Total||$2.03 billion||$1.90 billion||$2.05 billion|
Raising the Sales Tax
Michigan’s 6 percent sales tax, which dates back to 1994, is embedded in the state constitution. Technically it’s two levies: a 2 percent tax earmarked for the School Aid Fund and a 4 percent tax split by formula among local governments, the School Aid Fund (again), and the General Fund. All told, the 6 percent levy is divided as follows: the School Aid Fund receives 4.4 percent, 1 percent goes to the General Fund, and the remaining 0.6 percent goes to cities, villages, and townships under the Revenue Sharing Act.
Should Proposal 1 pass, the second of these taxes would be increased from 4 to 5 percent, yielding a total sales tax rate total sales tax rate of 7 percent and changing the distribution to 5 percent for the School Aid Fund, 1.25 percent for the General Fund, and 0.75 percent to local revenue sharing. Motor fuels would come out of the sales tax base (more on this later). Sales tax collections would increase by an estimated $1.43 billion in Fiscal Year 2016.
Increasing Motor Fuel Taxes
At present, motor fuel is subject to both the sales tax and a fuel excise tax. Under Proposal 1, motor fuel would be removed from the general sales tax base and the existing 19 cent per gallon excise would be scrapped, replaced with a 14.9 percent tax on the 12-month rolling average of wholesale gasoline prices (with a three-month lag). An inflation adjustment mechanism provides that the levy cannot increase by more than 5 cents per gallon above the rate of inflation or fall below the initial rate, adjusted for inflation or 5 percent per year, whichever is less.
The average wholesale price will have a floor of $2.80 / gallon, which is of course higher than fuel prices at present, and would yield a 41.7 cpg excise. Combined, the fuel tax proposals are expected to net $463.3 million in Fiscal Year 2016.
Establishing Affiliate Nexus
Legislation tie-barred to Proposal 1 adopts a broad definition of “nexus” to impose sales tax on many online and mail order retailers operating outside the state. Such laws are often called “Amazon taxes,” and this one is projected to bring in about $60 million a year if adopted.
Raising Vehicle Registration Fees
Michigan’s vehicle registration fees vary based on the manufacturer’s price of the vehicle, ranging from $33 to 148. Currently, the registration fees “depreciate” by 10 percent per year for the first five years in a partial reflection of a vehicle’s declining value; the tax package under consideration would phase out that depreciation. Registration fees would also be increased on heavy trucks. The state anticipates $60.9 million a year in additional revenue from these fees.
Enhancing Low-Income Supports
Proposal 1 would more than triple the size of Michigan’s Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). Currently, low-income taxpayers are permitted to take 6 percent of their allowable federal credit; legislation triggered by Proposal 1 would raise it to 20 percent as of tax year 2016. The Proposal also includes rolling back household income qualifiers for the homestead property tax credit for seniors and disabled filers. Low-income support provided through the tax code will reduce collections by an estimated $261.1 million in Fiscal Year 2017, since tax returns take place after the completion of the year.
All told, Proposal 1 will increase state revenue by an estimated $2 billion. About two-thirds of new revenue would go to transportation over the next three years. The table below shows the anticipated additional collections and distributions.
|NET IMPACT||FY 2016||FY 2017||FY 2018|
|Michigan Transportation Fund||$460.9 million||$891.0 million||$1.464 billion|
|MDOT Debt Service||$814.7 million||$456.2 million||$0|
|Recreation Account||$24.8 million||$25.6 million||$27.6 million|
|School Aid Fund||$336.5 million||$376.2 million||$393.8 million|
|Revenue Sharing||$106.4 million||$114.0 million||$118.3 million|
|General Fund||$286.6 million||$39.6 million||$43.1 million|
|Total||$2.030 billion||$1.903 billion||$2.047 billion|
The vote will be held on May 5th.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback