Four options for reforming N.C.’s tax system
The following op-ed appeared in the News & Observer of Raleigh, NC on January 27, 2013
In our increasingly global economy, jobs and investment can go just about anywhere. As we exit the economic downturn, the smart states are asking an important question: What about our state attracts entrepreneurs and talented individuals to set up shop here?
North Carolina policymakers are poised to face that question this legislative session. Tax reform ranks high on the agenda, as the state ranks 44th in the Tax Foundation’s 2013 State Business Tax Climate Index, a comprehensive ranking of tax structures in the 50 states. Compared with other states, we find that North Carolina has high rates on narrow tax bases, meaning some favored activities get preferential treatment while everything else is subject to discouragingly high tax burdens.
Taxes are just one thing that drives individual and business location decisions, but a tax change can have immediate effects. Many states today have crafted their own “tax personality” that distinguishes them as attractive places to live and work. Florida and Texas taxpayers enjoy going without a personal income tax, while Delaware residents embrace tax-free retail sales. North Carolina policymakers and taxpayers will decide which plan is best for the Tar Heel State.
Today, the Tax Foundation and the Carolina Business Coalition will release a guide to North Carolina’s tax system, its strengths and weaknesses, and four major reform options. Each option raises the same amount of revenue as today while moving to a more neutral, simple approach with broad bases and low rates.
• “Option A” makes North Carolina the most pro-growth tax system in the country, simplifying the personal income tax at 6 percent, lowering the statewide sales tax to 3.5 percent while expanding its base to services, and repealing the corporate income and franchise taxes.
• “Option B” keeps all the major taxes, but simplified and at low rates: a 5 percent income tax, 5 percent sales tax and 5 percent corporate tax. A similar positive reform was adopted in Utah, contributing to its economic success.
• “Option C” would eliminate taxes on individual and corporate income and broaden the sales tax base to services to make up the revenue. The total state sales tax rate would have to be raised to 8.75 percent to fully fund current levels of state spending, but the benefit of this option is that North Carolina would be one of the few states with no taxes on investment or job creation.
• “Option D” eliminates taxes on retail sales and corporate income, paying for these reductions with a single, simple tax on individual income at a flat 10 percent rate.
While these tax options look very different, each would move North Carolina to a more neutral tax treatment so the code is not picking winners and losers in the economy. For example, of the options that retain the sales tax, all expand the tax base to services and use the extra revenue to lower tax rates. This is a stark contrast to the current North Carolina sales tax system, which unfairly applies to sellers of goods but not sellers of services.
All plans also remove the antiquated franchise tax, a tax on business assets that strangles new investment. Business owners describe this tax as a “tax on breathing” because it is paid even if a business is unprofitable and discourages expansion and new equipment purchases.
Three of the options eliminate the corporate income tax entirely, thereby removing the tax most destructive to economic growth. While a corporation writes the corporate tax payment check, the real economic burden falls on consumers who must pay higher prices, workers who receive lower wages and shareholders who see lower dividends. Additionally, public finance experts list corporate income taxes as the most compliance-laden taxes, but despite all the paperwork, audits and legal fees, it raises only 4 percent of North Carolina’s state and local revenue.
Tax reform can be tough. But a fair, simple, pro-growth tax system is vital to creating new jobs and investment.
We hope that our report helps North Carolina build on its recent successes and make a great state even greater.
Scott Drenkard is an economist and Joseph Henchman is vice president for state projects at the Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan tax research group based in Washington.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback