Not to anyone’s surprise, the realty industry has come out against the taxA tax is a mandatory payment or charge collected by local, state, and national governments from individuals or businesses to cover the costs of general government services, goods, and activities. reform panel’s attempt to limit the federal government’s subsidization of their industry. From the Charlotte Observer:
The National Association of Realtors is “extremely upset” at a federal panel’s proposal to reduce the home mortgage interest deductionThe mortgage interest deduction is an itemized deduction for interest paid on home mortgages. It reduces households’ taxable incomes and, consequently, their total taxes paid. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reduced the amount of principal and limited the types of loans that qualify for the deduction. , its chief economist said recently at the group’s annual convention.
“We’re in shock,” said David Lereah, who said the Realtors had been promised that housing and charitable deductions would be protected. “Now this Bush commission has put all the housing subsidies on the table.”
The proposal, by the President’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform, “is not a trial balloon,” Lereah said. It’s not something the panel floats, fully expecting to trade it away later in exchange for something it really wants from the real estate industry. (Full story.)
Ask any economist that does not speak for the homebuilding or real estate industry and he or she will tell you that the home mortgage interest deduction has little economic justification.
Unfortunately, much of the backlash against proposed reforms has been within an income-class-distributional framework. Many of the defenders claim that limiting the deduction would hurt middle-class homeowners. However, they seem to ignore a simple fact: in order to take the deduction, you must itemize when filing taxes. And who tends to itemize rather than take the standard deductionThe standard deduction reduces a taxpayer’s taxable income by a set amount determined by the government. It was nearly doubled for all classes of filers by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as an incentive for taxpayers not to itemize deductions when filing their federal income taxes. ? High-income earners.
Over 90 percent of householders making over $200,000 in 2003 itemized, while less than 40 percent of households making under $50,000 in 2003 itemized. (See IRS Filing Statistics (Excel)).
Also, the Panel’s recommendations do not eliminate the deduction. They merely scale it down, especially at the top end (i.e., high property values). The proposal actually expands the deduction for lower and middle income homeowners who do not itemize. If anything, the Panel’s proposals would help the middle class.
Given the fallacy of the “middle-class homeowners will be hurt” defense of the mortgage interest deduction, it’s our hope that all parties can look beyond the game of short-term winners and losers and support policies that improve the economic well-being of society as a whole.Share