ACLU Joins Fight against the North Carolina “Amazon Tax” Disclosure Demands
June 24, 2010
In 2009, North Carolina passed an "Amazon" tax law requiring some online retailers to collect sales and use taxes on online purchases. To jump start compliance, the state revenue department has issued an audit to online retailer Amazon.com, allegedly demanding the names and addresses of all North Carolina residents who have bought from Amazon since 2003. The revenue department hoped to collect sales tax on all these purchases.
Amazon filed a lawsuit in federal court in Seattle (its company headquarters) to block the audit. The company's lawsuit states that the North Carolina revenue department's attempt to collect personal information about Amazon consumers and their purchases is a gross violation of consumer privacy, implicating the First Amendment and privacy laws.
Now, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has joined the legal battle, filing on behalf of six North Carolina residents and Asheville Councilman Cecil Bothwell. ACLU claims that North Carolina can make its sales tax assessments without intimate knowledge of customers' purchases. According to the ACLU, disclosing personal records for "thousands of Amazon customers would violate their constitutional rights to read and purchase the lawful materials of their choice, free from government intrusion."
As Amazon also noted, the revenue department's request is particularly intrusive where customers have purchased personal or controversial items. Such purchases by North Carolina residents include:
- Bipolar Disorder: A Guide for Parents and Families
- He Had It Coming: How to Outsmart Your Husband and Win Your Divorce
- Living with Alcoholism: Your Guide to Dealing with Alcohol Abuse and Addiction While Getting the Alcoholism Treatment You Need
- What to Do When You Can't Get Pregnant: The Complete Guide to All the Technologies for Couples Facing Fertility Problems
- Outing Yourself: How to Come out as Lesbian or Gay to Your Family, Friends, and Coworkers
The ongoing dispute in North Carolina is only one example of the nationwide struggle between online retailers and revenue-seeking states seeking to extend enforcement of sales taxes to out-of-state retailers not present in the jurisdiction. Amazon terminated its affiliate programs in Colorado when the state considered adopting a burdensome use tax compliance law. In New York, Amazon is fighting a tax law that requires sales tax collection on purchases shipped to the state, even as neither Amazon operations nor employees are present in the state. (The Tax Foundation has submitted a friend-of-the court ("amicus curiae") brief on Amazon's behalf in that case, currently before the state's Appellate Division.)
Online sales taxes represent a constitutionally dubious effort by states to create revenue windfalls. These taxes create a tremendous compliance burden on out-of-state businesses, implicate serious consumer privacy issues, signal hostility to businesses engaged in interstate commerce, and undermine states' efforts to create uniform sales tax standards.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback