Will Unions Pay for their “Cadillacs”? Some Say Yes, Some No
January 20, 2010
I wrote a commentary earlier today about one of the taxes in the Senate’s health care reform bill, the so-called Cadillac tax. My main point was that even though it’s the least economically damaging tax in any of the bills, House Democrats and their unionized supporters hate it. Now, due to the election of a 41st Republican in the Senate, House Democrats might have to swallow it and be satisfied with possibly empty promises that they’ll get tax relief later in the year.
Here’s a blog that quotes AFL-CIO legislative director Bill Samuel as saying the original Senate health care bill is unacceptable (which is what Chris Matthews predicted), but here’s a contrary quotation from the SEIU’s Andy Stern.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback