Seattle Must Not Care About Children Either
October 11, 2007
Ever since President Bush’s veto of a bill that would have increased SCHIP funding at the expense of a cigarette tax hike, the supporters of the bill have predictably come forth with the “You don’t care about the children” line. Continuing that logic, I guess the citizens of Seattle, home to a city that voted over two-thirds for John Kerry in the 2004 election, don’t care about children either because back in 2003, they rejected by a 2-1 margin a measure that would have raised taxes on coffee to fund early childhood education programs in the city. From the Seattle Post-Intelligencer:
Across Seattle, Initiative 77 left voters facing a difficult proposition: Should latte drinkers pony up an extra dime a cup to pay for child care and preschool programs?
The tax, formally known as the Early Learning and Care Campaign, would have raised money for preschool programs and continuing education for teachers.
For Seattle coffee drinkers, it would have meant an extra 10 cents on any cappuccino, latte, iced drink or Americano sold at a cafe, restaurant or coffee stand.
Early on, the measure was criticized by opponents, many from the coffee and restaurant industry. They labeled it as an unfair and regressive tax on their product.
Supporters said the money was desperately needed to ensure children are prepared and ready to learn when they walk through the doors of kindergarten.
So were the people of Seattle demonstrating a lack of concern for the welfare of children when they voted against a tax on coffee that would have paid for greater access to early childhood education? Fast-forward to 2007 where President Bush has said no to a plan to raise a tax on a single arbitrary product (cigarettes this time, not coffee) to pay for greater access for children’s health care, and he is labeled heartless. So either the people of Seattle and the President don’t care about kids, or the voters and politicians think it’s okay to go after one arbitrary group – smokers–but not another arbitrary group — coffee drinkers.
The fact of the matter is that only if cigarette taxes are too low due to the negative externality they impose on society should they ever be increased. Cigarettes or any other arbitrarily chosen product (like coffee) should never have its tax increased merely because someone wants to fund a program that supposedly provides broad public benefits. Such programs should be funded via a broad-based tax increase like that on sales or income.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback