Massachusetts Governor Bets Big on Casino Revenues
August 6, 2012
Last week, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick signed a compact with the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe allowing the tribe to open and operate a casino in the city of Taunton. The event was preceded by the approval of licenses for three casinos and one slot parlor within the state at the end of last year. Governor Patrick sought to bring the gambling industry into the state to create jobs and generate additional tax revenue. The state stands to earn money from licenses bids, which “would start at $85 million” for casinos and $25 million for slot parlors; in addition to machine fees and a huge cut of revenues—25 percent of casino revenues and 40 percent for the slot parlor. The tribal compact provides the Mashpee Wampanoag a discount—it will be required to forfeit 21.5 percent of gambling revenues to Massachusetts rather than the full twenty-five.
Casino revenue will be used for a variety of purposes (see Sections 57 through 64), from funding the State Gaming Commission itself to specific earmarks for public health, local capital projects, education, transportation infrastructure, economic development, general local aid, and even a “Race Horse Development Fund.”
According to Mashpee Wampanoag Chairman Cedric Cromwell, the casino agreement “brings [the Wampanoag] another step closer to achieving economic self-sufficiency…while providing much-needed jobs and revenue to Taunton, Southeastern Massachusetts and the Commonwealth as a whole.”
The agreement will now be submitted to the U.S. Department of the Interior for approval. Some worry it will be rejected because of the large portion of revenues that will be given over to the state of Massachusetts. Critics have even gone so far as to say the proportion that must be forfeited to the state is “ludicrous.”
Last year’s legislation was an attempt to compete with bordering states (namely, Connecticut) that operate casinos and gambling resorts. The New York Times reported this may be a “potential bonanza” as other close states—New Hampshire, Maine, and Rode Island—become worried that they may lose their state revenues to Massachusetts. Bloomberg Businessweek pointed out that “hundreds of Massachusetts residents” flock to casino resorts in Maine, Rhode Island, and Connecticut each year. If casinos open within Massachusetts borders, why wouldn’t these residents simply remain within state to gamble?
We’ve reported multiple times on the issues associated with gambling taxes. First and foremost, taxes such as these are highly nontransparent:
“State governments keep a portion of lottery revenue after they award prizes and cover operating costs, and that portion is used to fund programs entirely unrelated to lotteries or gambling…If this revenue were simply put back into the lottery agency and used to continue providing lottery games, then it would be a user fee; however, since this revenue is used for other government programs, or put into the general fund in some states, it is tax revenue, plain and simple.”
‘Since taxes provide government services enjoyed by everyone, taxes should also be paid by everyone. They should be levied at the same rate on all goods and services, not at higher rates on goods deemed unnecessary or unhealthy to the consumer (‘sin taxes’). The implicit tax rate on lotteries, however, is extremely high—much higher than any state's sales tax rate. “
State coffers aren’t the only thing the Governor hopes to stimulate. According to the Associated Press, “supporters of casino gambling predicted it will create as many as 15,000 jobs in Massachusetts, including 6,000 temporary construction jobs, and generate at least $300 million in new annual revenue for the state and its cities and towns.” Further, the state will likely collect approximated $300 million upfront when licenses are sold. But this revenue is far from guaranteed. States that expect such high revenues usually make overly-optimistic predictions and rarely earn the full amount they’ve projected—especially in light of the recent recession.
Politically, it will be difficult to decline such promising revenue projections, despite the uncertainty associated with them. A Brimfield resident worried that “the money a casino talks about can be intoxicating and the numbers are really staggering.” Another told the Times, “there are people that will say, ‘How can you turn down millions of dollars?’”
More on Massachusetts here.
Follow Elizabeth Malm on Twitter @lizzzmalm.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback