How Far we are from the Enlightenment
October 10, 2012
Bill Gale, co-author of the famous Tax Policy Center study that finds it is “mathematically impossible” to lower tax rates as Romney proposes without reducing revenue, elaborates on the central reasoning behind that study:
“Suppose Governor Romney said that he wants to drive a car from Boston to Los Angeles in 15 hours. And suppose some analysts employed tools of arithmetic to conclude that "If Governor Romney wants to drive from Boston to LA in 15 hours, it is mathematically impossible to avoid speeding." After all, the drive from LA to Boston is about 3,000 miles, so to take only 15 hours would require an average of 200 miles per hour. Certainly other road trips are possible — but the particular one proposed here is not.”
Bill Gale just equated the certainty of the distance between Boston and LA with the certainty that future taxpayers will respond to changes in tax rates in the precise way that he describes. I’m reminded of what Adam Smith said about the “man of system”:
“He seems to imagine that he can arrange the different members of a great society with as much ease as the hand arranges the different pieces upon a chess-board. He does not consider that the pieces upon the chess-board have no other principle of motion besides that which the hand impresses upon them; but that, in the great chess-board of human society, every single piece has a principle of motion of its own, altogether different from that which the legislature might chuse [sic] to impress upon it. If those two principles coincide and act in the same direction, the game of human society will go on easily and harmoniously, and is very likely to be happy and successful. If they are opposite or different, the game will go on miserably, and the society must be at all times in the highest degree of disorder.”
Predicting future human behavior is not simply about arithmetic, it is about economics and it is full of uncertainty. We have produced our own estimates of the effects of Romney’s plan, and they are very different from TPC’s. While we think our methods are more grounded in economics, and so do other economists, we must admit our predictions are likely to be less than perfectly accurate.
Follow William McBride on Twitter @EconoWill
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback