Effective Marginal Tax Rates, Not Average Tax Rates, Are the Most Relevant for International Comparisons of Tax Rates
October 30, 2008
A recent analysis by Chye-Ching Huang with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (PDF) correctly states that the U.S. has a low average tax rate (ATR), reflecting its relatively narrow tax base. Despite the high statutory corporate tax rate, the various special corporate provisions result in a low ATR.
Several things, however, need to be considered. First, the best measure for considering the competitiveness of the United States is neither the statutory corporate tax rate nor the ATR, but the effective marginal tax rate (EMTR). This measure is typically the focus of economists as relevant to a firm's decision of whether to invest another dollar or where to locate that dollar of investment. This measure is derived from an investment's cost of capital and shows the share of an investment's economic income needed to cover taxes over its lifetime.
What is important here is that the EMTR has been falling abroad, but has remained largely unchanged in the United States (see Figure 2 in Tax Foundation Fiscal Fact #143). Indeed, the trends we see in comparisons of the statutory corporate tax rate are very similar when considering trends in the EMTR. Some focus on the statutory corporate tax rate because it is emblematic of changes in the EMTR.
Second, most international comparisons of the ATR do not account for the large non-corporate sector in the United States as compared to other countries. Failing to account for the large non-corporate sector in the United States understates the U.S. ATR. Roughly one-third of business taxes in the U.S. are collected from owners of flow-through entities—partnerships, S corporations, and sole proprietorships—when they file their individual tax returns. Indeed, a back-of-the-envelope calculation that includes the roughly $150 billion in taxes paid on the business income reported by owners of flow-through entities increases the U.S. ATR (measured here as corporate revenue divided by gross domestic product) from about 2.2 percent to 3.3 percent, which is close to the OECD average of 3.5 percent, not dramatically below it.
Third, about one-half of the "narrowness" in the U.S. tax base can be attributed to accelerated depreciation for investment in equipment. Accelerated depreciation lowers the EMTR for investment by partially removing the tax on the return to investment at the margin. It also imbeds a VAT-type feature in our income tax. Indeed, this provision moves the U.S. income tax base towards that of a consumption tax. The hybrid nature of the U.S. income tax base conflates international comparisons of ATRs for corporate income taxes because the U.S. has, in effect, chosen to imbed VAT-type features in its income tax, while other nations have tended to impose more pure income taxes and stand-alone VATs.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback