D.C. Mayor to Divert Dedicated Funds from Stadium
July 28, 2009
D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty plans to divert $50 million from a dedicated Ballpark Revenue Fund to the general fund. So instead of paying off Nationals Park stadium debt, the money would help D.C. maintain spending without new taxes.
Dedicated funds are not really dedicated, it seems, at least not in the short term. The Social Security Trust Fund serves as a typical example. Workers pay a tax over their lifetimes and receive an implicit entitlement. But the Social Security Administration makes clear: “Like all federal entitlement programs, Congress can change the rules regarding eligibility—and it has done so many times over the years.” This can happen because of Helvering v. Davis, which said Social Security “taxes are to be paid into the Treasury like any other internal revenue generally, and are not earmarked in any way.”
So should taxes be kept in dedicated funds? While protecting funds may help approximate a user fee, it could also lead to wasteful spending. For example, an appropriately set tax on cars could exactly pay for the road damage they cause. If the road tax is set too high then roads may be unnecessarily repaved just to spend down the dedicated fund.
Despite any theory of dedicated funds, the D.C. story shows the difficulty in making tax dollars less fungible. D.C. businesses that thought their annual gross receipts taxes would stay in the ballpark fund are finding this out the hard way.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback