On March 30, North Carolina launched a state lottery, joining 41 other states and the District of Columbia. Lottery supporters fought for two decades to bring the lottery to North Carolina, and finally forced a lottery bill through the legislature last August. However, several clouds hang over their celebration, even amid the new lottery’s jubilant customers and employees.
First, there are accusations that the bill was passed as a result of underhanded maneuvering. Then there are the suspicions that funds raised by the North Carolina Education Lottery will partially supplant rather than supplement the education budget.
Finally, there is the lawsuit. A group represented by the North Carolina Institute for Constitutional Law filed suit against the state in December, arguing that the lottery is a taxA tax is a mandatory payment or charge collected by local, state, and national governments from individuals or businesses to cover the costs of general government services, goods, and activities. , and the legislature breached the state’s constitutional requirement that revenue bills be passed in both houses on three separate days. On Match 21, a judge ruled that the lottery is not a tax, and therefore the bill was passed constitutionally, and the lottery can proceed with ticket sales. The judge wrote, “A tax is a forced contribution to government which has no necessary immediate relationship to a benefit conferred.”
As a matter of tax policy and common sense, the judge’s reasoning is badly flawed. The purchase of any product—such as a lottery ticket—is voluntary, but the tax portion of the ticket price is not, just as a sales or excise taxAn excise tax is a tax imposed on a specific good or activity. Excise taxes are commonly levied on cigarettes, alcoholic beverages, soda, gasoline, insurance premiums, amusement activities, and betting, and typically make up a relatively small and volatile portion of state and local and, to a lesser extent, federal tax collections. is compulsory on a voluntary purchase of alcohol, clothing or books. Even income taxes would be “voluntary” by the judge’s reasoning; no one forces the taxpayer to take a job and earn income.
As for the second part of the judge’s argument—“A tax … has no necessary immediate relationship to a benefit conferred”—the chance to win a cash prize is not a benefit conferred by the lottery; it is a good purchased by a consumer. After prizes have been distributed and administrative costs have been covered, the money that is left from ticket sales is used to confer benefits—such as aid to public education—that are unrelated to the purchase of lottery tickets.Share