What’s Wrong with California’s Sales Tax Exemption for Groceries?
December 31, 2008
New regulations from the California State Board of Equalization (BOE) are supposed to clarify how grocers should tally their tax-exempt sales. Instead they inadvertently make a good argument for abolishing the tax exemption entirely.
Grocery tax exemptions have been sweeping the country on the flimsy argument that state sales taxes applied to groceries are unfair to the poor. In fact, the poor’s groceries, when purchased with food stamps, are better than tax-exempt – they’re free. If the legislature feels that food stamps are not reaching enough of California’s poor, or that the stamps aren’t worth enough to buy sufficient groceries, then California should expand its food stamp program and apply its general sales tax to all other grocery purchases.
Will there be some people just above the food stamp threshold for whom the tax will sting? Yes, but that demographic can be (and already is) targeted for tax relief through the income tax.
The damage done by the grocery exemption is considerable. It makes sales tax revenue much less stable, a major problem in California. It also forces up the tax rate on every other purchase: California’s minimum sales tax rate of 7.25% is highest in the nation. And as for the complex business of how grocers must sort out what’s taxable and what’s not, the BOE regulations speak for themselves:
1. “Exempt food products” means those items generally described as food products in Section 6359 and Regulation 1602. If grocers are uncertain as to the classification of any product, they should contact the nearest board office.
Gee, that’s not too helpful. If the BOE is so unclear about what’s exempt, maybe they do better describing what must be taxed:
Grocers selling clothes, furniture, hardware, farm implements, distilled spirits, drug sundries, cosmetics, body deodorants, sporting goods, auto parts, cameras, electrical supplies, appliances, books, pottery, dishes, film, flower and garden seeds, nursery stock, fertilizers, flowers, fuel and lubricants, glassware, stationery supplies, pet supplies (other than pet food), school supplies, silverware, sunglasses, toys and other similar property should not include the purchases and sales of such items in the purchase-ratio method.
Actually, that’s not too helpful either. Of the thousands of items not listed, which of them would be “similar to” farm implements, deodorant or sunglasses?
The complex BOE regulations go on and on, giving grocers advice on how to tally coupons, handling allowances, snack bars, gasoline sales, etc., etc. They describe the purchase-ratio method of calculating tax-exempt sales, the modified purchase-ratio method, the retail inventory method, and finally the mark-up method which includes this gem of a requirement:
Determine markup factor percentages by commodity groupings based on shelf tests covering a minimum purchasing cycle of one month within a three-year period.
But those aren’t all the methods grocers can use!
List of Methods Not Exhaustive. The methods by which grocers may determine their sales of exempt food products are not limited to the methods described above.
How about this for an alternative method: All sales by grocers subject to sales tax unless purchased with food stamps. The tax rate could be lower, the revenue more stable, and the regulations much shorter.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback