Prof. Maule on Strategies for Closing the Tax Gap
March 23, 2007
Villanova’s always-interesting Prof. James Maule has a thoughtful post on strategies for addressing the so-called federal “tax gap.” He boils down 28 years of experience teaching tax law into six basic ways Congress can make the U.S. tax code do its job better, ranging from tax education to tax simplification.
Here are his thoughts on the relationship between tax compliance and the complexity of the federal tax code—something we’ve often pointed out in the past:
Tax simplification is essential if rates of noncompliance are to be reduced. There is a direct correlation between noncompliance and complexity. As the tax law becomes more complicated, the ability of taxpayers to comply decreases. Even tax professionals who have every wish to keep their clients’ planning and return filing within the bounds of excellent compliance struggle with the rapidity of change, the dearth of guidance on many issues, and the numerous questions arising from the interaction of multiple provisions. The opportunities for tax simplification are easy to identify, and have been addressed by many commentators during the past decade. At this stage of analysis, the specifics do not matter as much as establishing a commitment to simplification as part of the effort to improve tax compliance.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback