Making the Problem Worse: Credits, Credits, and More Credits
January 4, 2007
An editorial in today’s Florida Times-Union is a perfect example of the problems caused by the mucking up of the tax code with politically driven tax credits.
If two families live in different states but have similar size and financial situations, their federal tax bills should be the same.
Prior to 1986, according to Tallahassee-based Florida TaxWatch, people could deduct all of their state and local taxes in computing how much they owed the IRS.
Then, Congress eliminated the sales tax deduction. That created an inequity.
If someone lived in a state that relied heavily on an income tax, he got a bigger break on his federal taxes than those who lived in a state relying on sales taxes.
The argument isn’t exactly subtle: those guys got theirs, we want ours.
Now imagine a tax code that includes literally tens of thousands of similar “we want ours” tax carve-outs that benefit special interests and politically popular groups. Actually, there is no need to imagine because it’s exactly what we have: a complex web of credits that pick apart the tax code like vultures fighting for scraps. Instead of a rational process that raises revenue to pay for America’s priorities, we have an insane system that mitigates inequity with more inequity.
The insanity is fueling current American disillusionment, anxiety and frustration over our financial future. No matter how much we pay, we always think the other guy is getting a break. The feeling creates insecurity and instability for American families who are unsure how to accurately plan for future financial needs, such as retirement and college tuition.
The editorial goes on:
Congress recently took a step toward solving the problem – an inadequate one, unfortunately.
The bill, signed by the president last month, allows people to deduct sales taxes for 2006 and 2007.
That’s a start. Why not either make the sales tax deduction permanent or, as an alternative, do away with all deductions for state and local taxes?
Why not make the sales tax deduction permanent? Because it exacerbates bad tax policy and increases the perception of unfairness. It’s only a matter of time before some other group realizes that they aren’t getting the preferences that some have and the downward spiral continues. More carve-outs. More inequity. More tax breaks. More inequity. “We want ours!”
The system is broken and these political solutions only further its disintegration.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback