“Inevitable” Gambling Expansion in Massachusetts?
June 15, 2007
Massachusetts is the most recent in a long line of states to consider increasing gambling revenue (casino taxes and implicit lottery taxes) to fill state coffers.
From an Associated Press article titled “State Auditor says casino gambling in Mass. may be inevitable“:
The state’s auditor is the latest high-ranking official to get behind the idea of expanded gambling in Massachusetts.
Joe DeNucci tells the Boston Herald that he thinks the state should move ahead immediately with allowing slot machines at Massachusetts racetracks.
He also predicts a full-scale casino will be up and running here in the next three to five years.
The auditor says without slots the racetracks will not survive.
State-run gambling enterprises such as lotteries and video lottery terminals at racetracks exemplify poor tax policy for several reasons: they are a regressive form of taxation, they are not economically neutral (they impose a higher tax rate on some goods than on others), they lack transparency (that is, the revenue they generate is not labeled tax revenue by the government), and government simply should not be involved in the gambling business.
Taxing privately run casinos is another matter and does not pose the same policy problems, although casino taxes are very complex and not neutral–they are higher than state sales taxes.
Click here for more on lottery and gambling taxes.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback