The Economist Editorial Board Understands Tax Reform
November 5, 2007
In its assessment of Charlie Rangel’s tax reform bill put forth two weeks ago in an article entitled “No more than a B-,” The Economist magazine published what may be the best paragraph on tax reform I have ever read on an editorial page:
With a bit more ambition, Mr Rangel could have suggested reforms that make the tax code more progressive and, at the same time, simpler. America’s personal income tax code is riddled with deductions—from the subtraction of mortgage interest to countless incentives for savings. Such deductions, which are worth hundreds of billions of dollars a year, narrow the tax base and distort behaviour, and their benefits flow disproportionately to the most affluent taxpayers. Capping these deductions, or getting rid of some altogether, would be a far better way to pay for AMT repeal.
To read the full article, click here.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback