Skip to content

Comparing Europe’s Tax Systems: Corporate Taxes

2 min readBy: Alex Mengden

On October 19, we released the International TaxA tax is a mandatory payment or charge collected by local, state, and national governments from individuals or businesses to cover the costs of general government services, goods, and activities. Competitiveness Index 2023, a study that measures and compares the competitiveness and neutrality of all 38 Organisation for Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries’ tax systems. In the coming weeks, we will illustrate how European OECD countries rank on each of the five components of the Index: corporate income taxes, individual taxes, consumption taxes, property taxes, and cross-border rules. Today, we look at how European countries’ corporate income taxA corporate income tax (CIT) is levied by federal and state governments on business profits. Many companies are not subject to the CIT because they are taxed as pass-through businesses, with income reportable under the individual income tax. systems compare within the OECD.

Unlike other studies that compare tax burdens, the Index measures how well a country structures its tax code. A tax code that is competitive and neutral promotes sustainable economic growth and investment and raises revenue for government priorities with minimal distortions. Our corporate income tax component scores countries not only on their corporate tax rates but also on how they handle net operating losses, capital allowances, inventory valuation, and allowances for corporate equity; whether and to what extent distortionary patent boxes and research and development (R&D) tax incentives are granted; the application of digital services taxes; and the complexity of the corporate income tax.

Comparing Corporate Tax Systems in Europe Corporate Tax Complexity and Compliance

Click here to see an interactive version of OECD countries’ corporate tax rankings, then click on your country for more information about its tax system’s strengths and weaknesses.

Latvia and Estonia have the best corporate tax systems in the OECD. Both countries have a cash-flow tax on business profits. This means that profits only get taxed when they are distributed to shareholders. If a business decides to retain or reinvest its profits instead of paying dividends to shareholders, there is no tax on such profits.

In contrast, Portugal has the least competitive and neutral corporate income tax system in Europe (Colombia ranks the lowest in the OECD). At 31.5 percent, Portugal levies one of the highest combined corporate tax rates on business profits, including multiple surtaxes. Only limited net operating losses can be carried forward and carried back; purchases of machinery, buildings, and intangibles cannot be fully expensed.

To see whether your country’s corporate tax rank has improved in recent years, check out the table below. To learn more about how we determined these rankings, read our full methodology here.

Comparing Corporate Tax Systems in the OECD, 2023

Corporate Tax Component Rankings on the International Tax Competitiveness Index between 2020 and 2023 (for all OECD countries)
Country2023 Rank2022 RankChange from 2022 to 20232021 Rank
Australia3230-230
Austria2023322
Belgium1514-114
Canada2427326
Chile3512-2318
Colombia3838035
Costa Rica3637137
Czech Republic6606
Denmark1718117
Estonia2202
Finland9909
France3435136
Germany3132132
Greece1919016
Hungary4405
Iceland1217515
Ireland5504
Israel1316312
Italy2125427
Japan3033331
Korea2629329
Latvia1101
Lithuania3303
Luxembourg2324124
Mexico2728128
Netherlands2526125
New Zealand2931233
Norway1415113
Poland1613-311
Portugal3736-138
Slovak Republic1821320
Slovenia7707
Spain3334134
Sweden8808
Switzerland1010010
Turkey1120923
United Kingdom2811-1719
United States2222021
Note: The map reflects the rankings of all 38 OECD countries.

Source: Tax Foundation, 2023 International Tax Competitiveness Index

Stay informed on the tax policies impacting you.

Subscribe to get insights from our trusted experts delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe
Share this article