CBO Projections of Spending and Tax Credits
February 11, 2013
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) just released some interesting graphics, showing spending projections for means-tested programs and tax credits, i.e. those programs and tax credits that are only available to low income households. Medicaid is the largest such program, at $251 billion in 2012, followed by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) at $80 billion. The refundable portion of the earned income tax credit (EITC) is next largest, at $54 billion, while the refundable child credit costs $28 billion. The refundable portion of tax credits are scored as spending, since they exceed any tax liability.
The growth of these programs and tax credits over the last two decades mainly reflects increasing participation, as more and more people were made eligible through such legislative expansions as the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Participation for the EITC grew from 9 million in 1991 to 25 million in 2011, while participation for the child credit grew from zero to 21 million over the same period. The recent fiscal cliff deal extended these expansions to the EITC and child credit for another 5 years.
These programs and tax credits form a large and growing share of so-called mandatory spending, which also includes Social Security and Medicare. As the chart below shows, mandatory spending represents the majority of the federal budget, and the part that has grown most dramatically in recent years. Mandatory spending was about 10 percent of GDP for most of the 30 years prior to 2008. It leapt to 15 percent of GDP in 2009 and now remains at 13.1 percent. It is projected to increase to 14.1 percent of GDP by 2023. Meanwhile, discretionary spending, on programs like defense, roads, and other infrastructure, is on a steady decline. Discretionary spending is now 8.3 percent of GDP and set to go to a 50 year low of 5.5 percent of GDP by 2023.
Follow William McBride on Twitter @EconoWill
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback