Note: This post was updated on November 9th to include the latest ballot measure results. Click here for updated state recreational marijuana taxA tax is a mandatory payment or charge collected by local, state, and national governments from individuals or businesses to cover the costs of general government services, goods, and activities. rates.
| Result | Ballot Measure | For | Against | % In |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Arkansas Issue 4 | 43.8% | 56.3% | 92% |
| ✔️ | Maryland Question 4 | 65.5% | 34.5% | 82% |
| ✔️ | Missouri Amendment 3 | 53.1% | 46.9% | 89% |
| ❌ | North Dakota Measure 2 | 45.1% | 54.9% | 99% |
| ❌ | South Dakota Measure 27 | 47.1% | 52.9% | 97% |
While changes to federal cannabis law are slow, changes at the state level are accelerating. Recreational cannabis is on the ballot in five states this November—Arkansas, Maryland, Missouri, North Dakota, and South Dakota—giving voters the ability to join 19 states that have already legalized recreational marijuana.
Arkansas
In Arkansas, Issue 4 would legalize the possession and use of up to one ounce of marijuana for adults aged 21 and over. If passed, Arkansas would levy a 10 percent supplemental sales tax on retail cannabis sales.
Arkansas would earmark 30 percent of the revenues from the cannabis tax: 15 percent would fund a stipend to all full-time law enforcement officers in good standing, 10 percent would fund the operations of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, and 5 percent would fund drug court programs. The remaining 70 percent of cannabis revenues would be directed to the general fund.
| Result | Ballot Measure | For | Against | % In |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Arkansas Issue 4 | 43.8% | 56.2% | 92% |
Maryland
Maryland voters will decide the fate of Question 4, an amendment to the Maryland Constitution permitting individuals 21 years and older to use and possess marijuana beginning in July 2023. The new amendment would automatically implement House Bill 837 (HB 837), which details legal possession quantities and fines for violating those quantity restrictions, while temporarily expanding decriminalization from January 1 to June 30, 2023.
HB 837 would also automatically expunge criminal convictions for conduct that would be made legal by the new constitutional amendment. Individuals serving time for such offenses would be allowed to file for resentencing.
Question 4 would also direct the Maryland State Legislature to identify and implement taxes and regulations for the new market. At this time, Maryland has not set a tax rate or structure for its cannabis market, nor have any bills identified a licensing or regulatory framework for vendors.
| Result | Ballot Measure | For | Against | % In |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✔️ | Maryland Question 4 | 65.5% | 34.5% | 82% |
Missouri
Voters in Missouri will find constitutional Amendment 3 on the ballot in November—one of the most comprehensive marijuana-related state ballot measures. It includes text related to possession, consumption, sales, criminal justice reform, and the tax structure.
If passed, the amendment would remove state prohibitions on purchasing, possessing, consuming, using, delivering, manufacturing, and selling marijuana for personal use for adults over the age of 21. Persons with certain non-violent marijuana-related offenses would be permitted to petition for release from incarceration or parole and probation and have their criminal records expunged. The proposal would enact a six percent tax on the retail price of recreational marijuana. State revenue estimates suggest initial revenues of $7.9 million for the state and $13.8 million for local governments.
| Result | Ballot Measure | For | Against | % In |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✔️ | Missouri Amendment 3 | 53.1% | 46.9% | 89% |
North Dakota
In North Dakota, Statutory Measure 2 gives voters the power to legalize the use and possession of up to one ounce of marijuana for adults aged 21 and older. This measure would also allow individuals to grow up to three marijuana plants.
The ballot measure contains a highly controversial and clearly misleading revenue estimate. The ballot fiscal summary reads, “The estimated fiscal impact of this measure beginning in 2023 through the 2025-2027 Biennium is Revenue of $3,145,000 and Expenses of $4,985,000.” Quick math shows this would be a net loss of roughly $1.8 million over five years.
The problem with the revenue estimate is that the state Tax Commission included no revenue from cannabis sales in their aggregate revenue estimate. The Tax Commissioner said that there were too many unknown variables, such as the price of cannabis and the number of sales, to create a tax revenue estimate. So, they didn’t estimate any revenue from sales: no revenue generated from the state’s 5 percent sales taxA sales tax is levied on retail sales of goods and services and, ideally, should apply to all final consumption with few exemptions. Many governments exempt goods like groceries; base broadening, such as including groceries, could keep rates lower. A sales tax should exempt business-to-business transactions which, when taxed, cause tax pyramiding. , nothing from optional 3 percent local sales taxes, and no revenue from a potential excise taxAn excise tax is a tax imposed on a specific good or activity. Excise taxes are commonly levied on cigarettes, alcoholic beverages, soda, gasoline, insurance premiums, amusement activities, and betting, and typically make up a relatively small and volatile portion of state and local and, to a lesser extent, federal tax collections. .
The $3.1 million in estimated revenue comes from anticipated application and registration fees from vendors. Our previous estimate put the revenue potential for cannabis as high as $13 million per year, or $65 million over five years. The misrepresented revenue figure on the ballot creates a strong headwind for the initiative in a state that already rejected a 2018 initiative (Measure 3), which would have legalized recreational marijuana and created an automatic expungement process for individuals convicted of certain marijuana crimes.
| Result | Ballot Measure | For | Against | % In |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | North Dakota Measure 2 | 45.1% | 54.9% | 99% |
South Dakota
South Dakota voters may feel a sense of déjà vu. Voters successfully supported a ballot initiative in 2020 to legalize recreational marijuana. However, that 2020 ballot measure was invalidated in November 2021 by the South Dakota Supreme Court. Voters will now head back to the ballot box for Initiated Measure 27, which would legalize the possession, distribution, and use of marijuana for persons who are at least 21 years old.
Unlike the 2020 measure (Amendment A), which would have imposed a 15 percent tax on marijuana sales, Measure 27 does not address taxation. The official fiscal statement is non-descript, “The State and counties could see a minimal decrease in expenses due to decreased incarceration for marijuana-related offenses, and the State could see marginal additional revenue in the form of new civil penalty fines.” Voters approved Amendment A by an eight-point margin (54 percent to 46 percent), but Measure 27 has clear differences from its predecessor.
| Result | Ballot Measure | For | Against | % In |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | South Dakota Measure 27 | 47.1% | 52.9% | 97% |
Across the country, November will be an important month at the ballot box for both the continued legalization and taxation of recreational marijuana.
Green Rush: Principles for Taxing Cannabis