We are frequently asked if we support any particular taxA tax is a mandatory payment or charge collected by local, state, and national governments from individuals or businesses to cover the costs of general government services, goods, and activities. reform plan such as the Flat TaxAn income tax is referred to as a “flat tax” when all taxable income is subject to the same tax rate, regardless of income level or assets. or the FairTax.
As an institution, the Tax Foundation believes that the current income tax system is fundamentally broken and should be replaced with a code adhering to the principles we have advocated for 70 years: neutrality, simplicity, stability, transparency, and growth promotion.
We do not align ourselves with any particular tax reform camp. Indeed, we have Flat Tax advocates and sales taxA sales tax is levied on retail sales of goods and services and, ideally, should apply to all final consumption with few exemptions. Many governments exempt goods like groceries; base broadening, such as including groceries, could keep rates lower. A sales tax should exempt business-to-business transactions which, when taxed, cause tax pyramiding. advocates on our Board of Directors, and our research was cited in both Steve Forbes’ book on the Flat Tax and Neil Boortz’s book on the FairTax.
From an economic perspective, there are many similarities between the FairTax and a Flat Tax. For example:
Both the FairTax and the Flat Tax are “consumption taxA consumption tax is typically levied on the purchase of goods or services and is paid directly or indirectly by the consumer in the form of retail sales taxes, excise taxes, tariffs, value-added taxes (VAT), or an income tax where all savings is tax-deductible. es.” In other words, people are taxed for spending money, not earning it. The Flat Tax would require citizens to file tax returns as they do now, paying tax on all spent money (income minus savings). The FairTax would rely on merchants to collect tax at the point of sale, as they now collect state and local sales taxes.
Both would eliminate the estate and capital gains taxA capital gains tax is levied on the profit made from selling an asset and is often in addition to corporate income taxes, frequently resulting in double taxation. Capital gains taxes create a bias against saving, leading to a lower level of national income by encouraging present consumption over investment. es.
Both plans are single tax rate systems that eliminate double taxationDouble taxation is when taxes are paid twice on the same dollar of income, regardless of whether that’s corporate or individual income. .
Both plans would dramatically reduce compliance costs and the tax system’s dead-weight loss to the economy.
Any tax reform plan will have transition issues and these will have to be thought through carefully. That said, the long-term benefits of fundamental tax reform should far outweigh the short-term transition costs.
It is disappointing that tax reform has moved to the back burner in America while it is at the top of the agenda in countries as diverse as Australia, Slovakia, India and China. According to a recent OECD report on global tax reform trends:
These tax reforms have been driven by the need to provide a more competitive fiscal environment: one which encourages investment, risk-taking, entrepreneurship and provides increased work incentives. At the same time, governments are aware of the need to maintain taxpayers’ faith in the integrity of their tax systems. Fairness and simplicity have become the byword of reformers.
These reforms are not happening in a vacuum; they directly impact U.S. competitiveness in the global economy and we will fall behind if Washington continues to drag its feet.Share