The Benefits of Neutral Tax Treatment of Saving and Consumption July 22, 2015 Stephen J. Entin Stephen J. Entin Download Attached Document Earlier this week I gave a talk on the economic benefits of fundamental tax reform. I’ve included a link to the slides that accompanied my remarks at the July 20th event. Here are some key points: The income tax falls more heavily on income used for saving than on income used for consumption. It is important for people to use retirement accounts to offset the tax bias against saving; they yield enormous gains in retirement assets income compared to ordinary saving. The double taxation of corporate income and distributions to shareholder’s results in very high tax rates, which have been made worse in recent years by the 2013 budget deal and the Affordable Care Act tax on investment income. Estate and gift taxes are additional taxes on capital accumulation that can reach astonishing levels when piled on top of other income and payroll taxes. The depreciation rules in the tax code seriously understate the cost of plant and equipment, resulting in the overstatement of profit and higher tax rates on businesses. The GDP, and labor and capital income, could be nearly 13 percent higher if these additional layers of tax on capital income and accumulation were repealed, with little long term revenue loss to the government. GDP would be $3.25 trillion higher; there would be 3.1 million additional full-time equivalent jobs, and the long run gains in personal income would be more than $60 for each dollar of revenue loss for the government after all economic adjustments. Stay informed on the tax policies impacting you. Subscribe to get insights from our trusted experts delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe Share Tweet Share Email Topics Center for Federal Tax Policy Business Taxes Corporate Income Taxes Estate, Inheritance and Gift Taxes Individual Income and Payroll Taxes Tax and Economic Modeling