Will Congressional Business Actitvity Tax Nexus Reform Spur Tax Sheltering?
June 16, 2005
The Federation of Tax Administrators (FTA) recently adopted a resolution opposing business activity tax nexus reform in Congress. H.R. 1956, the current legislative vehicle for such reform in Congress, would require a company to have an in-state physical presence to pay business activity tax (e.g. corporate income, franchise, gross receipts, etc.). The FTA opposes the bill because, in the words of executive director Harley Duncan, it would create “the opportunity to engage in a variety of tax planning activities so you can shelter more and more income from taxation.”
There is a common belief among tax administrators, and their organizations such as the FTA and the Multistate Tax Commission (MTC), that corporate tax sheltering is eroding state corporate income taxes. They are fearful that the adoption of a nationwide physical presence standard would further this erosion, despite the fact that many state court decisions already require in-state physical presence to establish nexus.
The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, which does a remarkable job of tracking state tax revenues, reports that state corporate income tax receipts rose by 61 percent in the first quarter of 2005 (buoyed by California’s tax amnesty program). Corporate income taxes outpaced all other major sources of state revenue, including personal income taxes and sales taxes. It’s hard to believe that tax sheltering is causing a major dent in state corporate taxes when they are growing so robustly.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback