Skip to content

A Taxing Approach to High Energy Costs Will Backfire

By: Alex Muresianu

People are frustrated with soaring energy prices, and Congress has taken notice. Sadly, the response so far has been to recycle old policy ideas that seek to punish producers, hoping they will spur energy bills to take a turn for the better.

Two policies in particular are worth examining. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) introduced the “Big Oil Windfall Profits Tax Act,” which would permanently taxA tax is a mandatory payment or charge collected by local, state, and national governments from individuals or businesses to cover the costs of general government services, goods, and activities. sales of crude oil at 50 percent of the gap between the current quarter’s average price and the 2025 average. Meanwhile, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) have introduced a bill called the “Taxing Buybacks from Big Oil Windfalls Act,” raising the stock buyback tax from 1 percent to 25 percent for oil and gas companies.

While these ideas might have some visceral appeal, taxing producers is the opposite of a solution to a supply crisis.

This is a preview of our full op-ed originally published in The Hill.

Continue reading

Stay informed on the tax policies impacting you.

Subscribe to our free newsletter to get the latest tax data, news and analysis.

Subscribe

About the Author

Alex Muresianu Tax Foundation

Alex Muresianu

Senior Policy Analyst

Alex Muresianu was a Senior Policy Analyst at the Tax Foundation, focused on federal tax policy. Previously working on the federal team as an intern in the summer of 2018 and as a research assistant in summer 2020. He attended Tufts University, graduating with a degree in economics and minors in finance and political science.