The Intimidation of Consensus Forecasting
Special Report January 1984
Executive Summary A year ago at this time and in this setting, the fashionable view was that economic recovery had not yet begun and as it unfolded in 1983 it would be very moderate. As we now know, that view was wrong inasmuch as the recover y which began in December of 1982 has turned out to be twice as strong as most people expected in spite of rather high interest rates that were expected to be a restraining force. Those who treat monetary policy as a major element in their forecasting were less surprised than others. A sustained spell of very rapid money growth signaled early on a relatively strong recovery, at least in the first two or three quarters.
Now we find ourselves looking ahead to 1984-85 in which the consensus view holds that economic recovery will continue through 1984 at a more moderate pace, say, about 4 % compared to the 6% or 7% we have experienced in the past four quarters. Inflation is expected to accelerate, particularly in the second half of the year and grow worse in 1985. Interest rates are expected to increase along with the maturing of the recovery and the rise of inflation.
Forecasters of a more cynical bent point out that 1984 is a presidential election year and, therefore, nothing can be al lowed to go wrong, even though history does not especially support that view.
Will the fashionable view be surprised again by the actual events of 1984? Before I answer that question, I would like to discuss for a moment the pitfalls of consensus forecasts.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback