February 10, 2010 Distributional Analysis of President Obama’s Fiscal Year 2011 Budget Policies Patrick Fleenor Gerald Prante Patrick Fleenor, Gerald Prante Print this page Subscribe Support our work Download Fiscal Fact No. 209 Fiscal Fact No. 209 This Tax Foundation Fiscal Fact takes a preliminary look at the distributive effects of President Obama’s budget, released last week. Using the Tax Foundation’s Fiscal Incidence Microsimulation Model, we are able to estimate the level of income redistribution in both existing and proposed federal fiscal policies and thereby estimate the change in income redistribution that would come about as a result of a given policy change. Even though Pres. Obama’s budget is titled “Fiscal Year 2011 Budget,” it includes estimates for his policy proposals over the next ten years (2011-2020). Therefore, this Fiscal Fact looks at fiscal year 2012 so as to avoid complications that come about as a result of the fiscal-calendar year split of the Bush tax cuts set to expire on Dec. 31, 2010. For simplicity, the baseline used in this Fiscal Fact is the same baseline used in Pres. Obama’s budget. Also, due to uncertainty regarding the specifics involved, we exclude from this analysis three “allowance” categories in the president’s budget: jobs initiative allowance, health care reform allowance, and climate change allowance. Our measure of income redistribution is relatively simple as we ask two hypothetical questions: (1) How much in federal taxes does a given income group pay under a given set of tax policies? (2) How much in federal taxes would that income group pay under a benefit principle system of taxation whereby a given family’s tax share was equal to its share of the benefits from government spending? The difference between the answers to these two questions is our measure of income redistribution. Before we present the results, we should answer two commonly asked questions pertaining to the methodology. First, we assume that national defense benefits each family in proportion to its share of cash income received. Second, we assume that the deficit is borne by today’s families and is financed by a combination of proportional tax increases and proportional spending reductions (entitlements weighted more heavily). For a further discussion of the methods used in this report, see our Special Report released on last year’s budget. Results Our results are presented in the three tables below. Table 1 summarizes the average change in income redistribution from Obama’s policies. Table 2 provides somewhat more detail, including a tax and spending breakdown, while Table 3 shows the aggregate effects of federal fiscal policies on the distribution of income. Overall, the results show Pres. Obama increasing the level of income redistribution to low-and-middle income families, while families in the top 1 percent of the income spectrum would face higher taxes and therefore more redistribution. The primary driver of this result is Pres. Obama’s expiration of the Bush tax cuts for high-income families, as well as his proposed 28 percent value limitation on itemized deductions. Table 1: Summary of Income Redistribution in Fiscal Year 2012 Pre- and Post-Obama Budget Policies Market Income Percentile Average Income Redistribution (OMB Baseline) Average Income Redistribution (Obama Policy) Change in Income Redistribution 0-10% 17,467 17,962 494 10-20% 10,299 11,148 850 20-30% 8,759 9,597 838 30-40% 6,105 6,721 616 40-50% 5,331 5,766 435 50-60% 3,172 3,694 522 60-70% -203 475 678 70-80% -3,897 -2,952 946 80-90% -10,720 -9,172 1,548 90-95% -16,864 -14,316 2,548 95-99% -48,649 -48,404 245 99-100% -407,943 -509,257 -101,314 ALL 0 0 0 Exhibit: Top 20% -39,965 -43,643 -3,678 Top 10% -69,279 -78,195 -8,916 Top 5% -121,345 -141,648 -20,304 Top 1% -407,943 -509,257 -101,314 Table 2: Distributional Impact on Average Families of Proposed Policies in President Obama’s Budget, Fiscal Year 2012 Market Income Percentile Average Market Income Obama Policy Change from OMB Baseline Average Tax Average Spending Average Income Redistribution Average Tax Average Spending Average Income Redistribution 0-10% 5,356 1,804 19,766 17,962 -35 459 494 10-20% 19,591 4,066 15,215 11,148 -55 795 850 20-30% 33,244 6,691 16,288 9,597 -126 711 838 30-40% 47,103 9,818 16,538 6,721 -234 382 616 40-50% 63,517 13,052 18,818 5,766 -364 71 435 50-60% 83,606 17,544 21,238 3,694 -539 -17 522 60-70% 107,555 22,929 23,405 475 -758 -80 678 70-80% 136,622 29,757 26,805 -2,952 -1,094 -148 946 80-90% 182,188 41,271 32,099 -9,172 -1,797 -249 1,548 90-95% 254,912 57,174 42,858 -14,316 -2,901 -352 2,548 95-99% 443,197 113,145 64,741 -48,404 -968 -723 245 99-100% 2,311,279 778,178 268,921 -509,257 97,570 -3,744 -101,314 ALL 99,575 24,312 24,312 0 189 189 0 Exhibit: Top 20% 360,377 96,948 53,305 -43,643 3,131 -547 -3,678 Top 10% 538,985 152,756 74,561 -78,195 8,071 -845 -8,916 Top 5% 821,166 247,701 106,053 -141,648 18,970 -1,334 -20,304 Top 1% 2,311,279 778,178 268,921 -509,257 97,570 -3,744 -101,31 Table 3: Distributional Impact on Family Income Groups (Aggregate) of Proposed Policies in President Obama’s Budget, Fiscal Year 2012 Market Income Percentile Market Income (millions) Share of Income Income After Redistribution Aggregate Change in Redistribution from Policies (millions) OMB Baseline OMB Policy Total Income (millions) Share of Income Total Income (millions) Share of Income 0-10% 94,011 0.7% 400,608 2.8% 409,286 2.8% 8,678 10-20% 344,024 2.4% 524,864 3.6% 539,788 3.7% 14,924 20-30% 555,082 3.9% 701,340 4.9% 715,326 5.0% 13,986 30-40% 736,851 5.1% 832,348 5.8% 841,987 5.8% 9,638 40-50% 932,215 6.5% 1,010,459 7.0% 1,016,839 7.1% 6,381 50-60% 1,090,963 7.6% 1,132,357 7.9% 1,139,166 7.9% 6,809 60-70% 1,269,713 8.8% 1,267,317 8.8% 1,275,325 8.8% 8,008 70-80% 1,532,643 10.6% 1,488,924 10.3% 1,499,531 10.4% 10,608 80-90% 1,994,960 13.8% 1,877,571 13.0% 1,894,527 13.1% 16,956 90-95% 1,387,724 9.6% 1,295,917 9.0% 1,309,789 9.1% 13,871 95-99% 1,937,473 13.4% 1,724,802 12.0% 1,725,872 12.0% 1,070 99-100% 2,562,874 17.8% 2,110,524 14.6% 1,998,182 13.9% -112,343 ALL 14,412,829 100.0% 14,412,829 100.0% 14,412,829 100.0% 0 Exhibit: Top 20% 7,883,031 54.7% 7,008,814 48.6% 6,928,369 48.1% -80,445 Top 10% 5,888,071 40.9% 5,131,244 35.6% 5,033,842 34.9% -97,401 Top 5% 4,500,347 31.2% 3,835,326 26.6% 3,724,054 25.8% -111,273 Top 1% 2,562,874 17.8% 2,110,524 14.6% 1,998,182 13.9% -112,343 Topics Center for Federal Tax Policy Individual and Consumption Taxes Research Tags Barack Obama Millionaires and High Income Earners