Sen. Barack Obama has an ad running that tries to paint John McCain as a clone of George Bush. On the issue of taxA tax is a mandatory payment or charge collected by local, state, and national governments from individuals or businesses to cover the costs of general government services, goods, and activities. es, the ad says this:
"Tax breaks for big corporations and the wealthy. But almost nothing for the middle class — same as Bush."
First, the claim that tax breaks for big corporations don't flow to the middle class is factually incorrect. All taxes are paid by people and all tax cuts flow to people, including those legally remitted by businesses (such as corporationAn S corporation is a business entity which elects to pass business income and losses through to its shareholders. The shareholders are then responsible for paying individual income taxes on this income. Unlike subchapter C corporations, an S corporation (S corp) is not subject to the corporate income tax (CIT). s). How much is paid by the "middle class" depends on questions of economic incidence of the corporate income taxA corporate income tax (CIT) is levied by federal and state governments on business profits. Many companies are not subject to the CIT because they are taxed as pass-through businesses, with income reportable under the individual income tax. , but it's not nothing.
Now regarding the claim that McCain's tax cuts and Bush's tax cuts provide no relief to the middle class, that is just downright false.
First, if you count McCain's health care tax creditA tax credit is a provision that reduces a taxpayer’s final tax bill, dollar-for-dollar. A tax credit differs from deductions and exemptions, which reduce taxable income, rather than the taxpayer’s tax bill directly. , he provides substantial relief to middle-income tax units over the next ten years, possibly more than Obama. Second, even ignoring the health care tax credit, the baseline Obama is using to make that claim is current policy with an AMT patch. Yet when Obama talks about his own tax plan, he compares it to a different baseline (current policy without an AMT patch). How much this affects the "middle class" depends upon your definition of middle class.
Finally, the claim that Bush provided nothing to the middle class is incorrect. In 2007, according to a Tax Policy Center run, the average middle income tax unit saved $754 from the combined effects of EGTRRA, JGTRRA, WFTRA, and an AMT patch relative to a pre-EGTRRA with AMT patch baseline. Both Obama and McCain favor extending the Bush tax cuts for this middle income group, something McCain has falsely hinted that Obama does not support.
Once again, I'll say it: When the candidates talk tax policy either on the stump or in advertisements, don't believe what they say because there is a high probability they are just making it up.
For a factchecking of Sen. McCain's latest Joe the Plumber ad, click here.Share