Skip to content

The Negative Impact of a New Gross Receipts Tax in San Francisco

2 min readBy: Nicole Kaeding

Among the long list of initiatives on ballots in San Francisco this November, residents will be asked to approve a new gross receipts taxA tax is a mandatory payment or charge collected by local, state, and national governments from individuals or businesses to cover the costs of general government services, goods, and activities. to fund homelessness services. Proposition C would limit job opportunities in the city, while raising prices for consumers.

Proposition C would create a gross receipts taxA gross receipts tax, also known as a turnover tax, is applied to a company’s gross sales, without deductions for a firm’s business expenses, like costs of goods sold and compensation. Unlike a sales tax, a gross receipts tax is assessed on businesses and apply to business-to-business transactions in addition to final consumer purchases, leading to tax pyramiding. on companies with more than $50 million in sales within San Francisco. The rate would vary based on industry, with an average rate of 0.5 percent. (This would be in addition to San Francisco’s existing gross receipts tax, which has rates between 0.16 percent and 0.65 percent.)

The San Francisco Controller’s Office estimated that the proposed gross receipts tax would raise $250 million to $300 million annually, with approximately 300 to 400 firms being impacted.

Proposition C Tax Rates
Industry Tax Rate under Proposition C

Source: San Francisco Controller’s Office

Wholesale & Retail Trade, Certain Services 0.175%
Information, Manufacturing, Food Services, Transportation, & Warehousing 0.500%
Accommodations, Utilities, Arts, Entertainment, & Recreation 0.425%
Administrative Services, Private Education, and Health Services 0.690%
Construction 0.475%
Financial Services, Insurance, Professional, and Technical Services 0.600%
Real Estate 0.325%

Stay informed on the tax policies impacting you.

Subscribe to get insights from our trusted experts delivered straight to your inbox.


Proponents of the initiative argue that the tax increase would be borne by “the City’s very largest employers—not regular San Franciscans,” but that analysis falls flat. While large companies would bear the legal incidence of the tax, city residents would bear the economic costs of the taxes. As firms grapple with the increased tax liability, they will likely react in a few ways.

First, they will likely reduce job opportunities. Analysis by the San Francisco Office of Economic Analysis estimated that the proposal would cost the city 725 to 875 jobs. San Francisco businesses already pay a large amount in local taxes for their employees, an estimated average of $2,500. Proposition C would increase that amount to more than $3,700 a year, an almost 50 percent increase.

Second, firms might look to move outside of the city to escape the tax. The aforementioned figures do not account for any firm relocations that might happen, but raising taxes could encourage that behavior.

Third, the tax increase would likely result in higher prices for consumers. If a firm is unable to shift the costs of the tax to its labor force, by relocating or trimming employment, the firm will likely shift the increases to consumers. Price increases due to gross receipts taxes are well-documented.

Cities and states across the country continue to explore raising and creating new gross receipts taxes, even though the negative economic impacts are well understood and acknowledged. Raising a gross receipts tax in San Francisco could limit job opportunities in the city and increase prices paid by consumers.