Bank associations representing every state in the country sent a letter to Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) on Tuesday, encouraging Congress to review the tax exemptionA tax exemption excludes certain income, revenue, or even taxpayers from tax altogether. For example, nonprofits that fulfill certain requirements are granted tax-exempt status by the IRS, preventing them from having to pay income tax. given to credit unions. Unlike banks, which are subject to corporate income taxA corporate income tax (CIT) is levied by federal and state governments on business profits. Many companies are not subject to the CIT because they are taxed as pass-through businesses, with income reportable under the individual income tax. es, credit unions are exempt; but the exemption, which dates to the Great Depression-era, has been under increasing scrutiny as the financial sector has changed over the last several decades. As the letter emphasizes, it would be useful for lawmakers to reexamine the extent to which credit unions currently fulfill their original, taxA tax is a mandatory payment or charge collected by local, state, and national governments from individuals or businesses to cover the costs of general government services, goods, and activities. -exempt purpose and to resolve any occurrences of special tax treatment.
As we have written previously, credit unions were exempted from paying corporate income taxes in 1934, with the understanding that they would: 1) help unbanked, lower-income individuals, 2) restrict their customer base, and 3) avoid high-risk, high-return investments. The Joint Committee of Taxation estimates that exempting credit unions from taxation for fulfilling this purpose will cost $2.9 billion in 2018 in terms of lost corporate income tax revenue.
An indication that Congress might revisit the exemption came earlier this year, when Chairman Hatch sent a letter to the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), the federal agency that regulates credit unions. In it, he expressed concern “that the credit union industry is evolving in ways that take many credit unions further from their original tax-exempt purpose.” It went on to outline several ways that credit unions seem to have strayed and requested that the NCUA provide information to help the committee better understand the agency’s oversight of credit union activity.
It was the Chairman’s letter that prompted 52 state bankers associations to urge congressional review of the credit union tax exemption issue. In their letter to the Chairman, they say there is no reason certain “credit unions, which act and look just like the taxpaying banks they compete with, should be completely free of income taxation,” and that the exemption’s “public policy justification disappeared long ago.” They explain that over the past decade, certain credit unions have undergone significant growth in size and in scope, appear to have little distinction from banks, and largely engage in activities like that of their taxed competitors. The bankers associations suggest that Congress should resolve any instances of special treatment by applying the tax code equally to all financial institutions that engage in similar activities.
If, after receiving information about the NCUA’s oversight activity, Congress finds that certain credit unions have strayed from their intended function and now resemble taxed banks, their exemption would represent a disparity across similar economic activity created by the tax code. This shows the importance of regular congressional review of all tax expenditureTax expenditures are a departure from the “normal” tax code that lower the tax burden of individuals or businesses, through an exemption, deduction, credit, or preferential rate. Expenditures can result in significant revenue losses to the government and include provisions such as the earned income tax credit, child tax credit, deduction for employer health-care contributions, and tax-advantaged savings plans. s, as it could reveal areas in need of reform.Share