Colorado Voters Look Past Amendent 23 and Loosen TABOR Limits
November 2, 2005
Yesterday, Colorado voters narrowly approved Referendum C, which allows the state government to keep and spend the TABOR surplus over the next five years. Voters narrowly rejected Referendum D, which would have allowed the state to borrow up to $2 billion for certain transportation and education projects.
The result in Referendum C is a good example of how scare tactics can obscure the ability of the public to make sound fiscal decisions. TABOR opponents blamed it for reducing state funding for roads, health care, higher education, and the like. But in doing so, they ignored the true culprit: Amendment 23, which requires Colorado to increase education funding every year regardless of tax revenue growth. In fact, all of Colorado’s alleged fiscal ills emerged after the voters approved Amendment 23 in 2000.
Amendment 23—not TABOR—is the true fiscal villain in Colorado. TABOR certainly does reduce the size of the fiscal pie as Colorado grows out of recession (the so-called “ratchet effect”), but Amendment 23 demands that education get a bigger and bigger slice, no matter how big the pie is. In fact, K-12 education consumed 40.7 percent of Colorado’s general fund revenues in 1996, but it will consume 43.3 percent in 2006. This effect is particularly acute during a time of recession, when tax revenues fall, as they did in Colorado a few years ago.
As lawmakers in other states move forward with “ratchet-less” TABOR proposals, they should remember the true issues involved in the Colorado TABOR debate, and not fall for the same scare tactics that were so successful in Colorado.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback