Recent Developments on the EU Digital Turnover Tax
September 13, 2018
Since March of this year, the European Union (EU) has been considering a proposal to tax the revenues of digital companies. The tax would be a 3 percent levy on revenues generated from digital services at large corporations. Turnover taxes like the one being proposed ignore the costs associated with sales and create serious economic distortions very much like taxes on gross receipts.
The proposal is designed such that the revenues subject to the tax would be attributed to countries partially based on assumptions about the value that users of digital services create. It is expected that the proposal would raise approximately €5 billion ($5.8 billion) per year—an amount equal to 0.08 percent of revenues raised by EU countries in 2016.
Multinational digital companies based in the U.S. like Facebook, Google, Apple, Amazon, and Microsoft would likely be impacted by the tax.
The tax proposal has been met with various levels of criticism and support. Some concerns with the turnover tax point out its potential harmful effects—especially for start-ups. Several EU countries are calling for a more global solution from the OECD rather than one that potentially pits the EU against major trading partners. Despite those concerns and other questions about the proposal, the proponents of the digital tax are pushing forward.
Austria is currently in its presidency term for the EU and has announced plans to reach a conclusion of the debate on the turnover tax by the end of the year. The Austrian government is supportive of the proposal and is hoping that countries that oppose the tax can agree to a compromise proposal.
The French finance minister, one of the strongest supporters of the plan, has offered some potential changes to the turnover tax as part of an effort to court some of the opponents of the plan. These potential changes include:
- Revenue sharing arrangement
- Sunset clause tied to the adoption of an OECD solution for digital taxation
The revenue sharing arrangement would be designed to compensate countries that would lose out under the new scheme to apportion revenues based on user interactions. The goal of the sunset clause is to recognize that a more global solution would replace the EU turnover tax when the OECD reaches an agreement on digital taxation. The OECD review of digital taxation options is expected to conclude in 2020.
Austria has also offered a concession that would exclude the sale of user data from the tax, potentially eroding much of the base upon which the tax would apply. This would result in an even lower amount of revenue raised than the initial proposal.
Tax legislation at the EU level currently requires unanimity among member countries to be adopted. However, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker is calling for a change of procedure to allow tax proposals to be adopted by a qualified majority, or 55 percent of member states representing at least 65 percent of the EU population. This method of adoption would likely sideline smaller countries that oppose the turnover tax.
The key problem with the 3 percent digital tax is not whether revenues would be appropriately shared, how temporary it might be, or what is included or excluded in the tax base. The problem is that turnover taxes are fundamentally economically harmful. Without changing the underlying structure of the tax, the potential options are simply offers to make cosmetic changes rather than address the main issues with the proposal.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback