What’s the proper way to tax personal saving and investment? It’s a great question, and under current tax law, we have lots of different answers! Specifically, we have four of them, which I’ll get to in a moment. But...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- Tax Foundation Brief: Stopping the IRS's Revival of ...
Tax Foundation Brief: Stopping the IRS's Revival of an Obsolete Tax
In 1898, the United States went to war with Spain and enacted an excise tax on telephone service to help pay for it. Repealed in 1902, re-enacted in 1917, repealed in 1924, and re-enacted in 1932, the tax was “temporarily” extended a further 29 times until it was made permanent in 1990.
In all other respects, the substantive provisions of the federal excise tax on telephone service has not changed since 1966. The tax is imposed on (1) local telephone service, (2) long-distance telephone service where price varies by distance and elapsed time, and (3) teletypewriter exchange service. Technological advances and changes in telephone habits have rendered teletypewriter exchanges obsolete, and long-distance service is now priced on time or in bundled services, rather than the per-call time and distance defined by the statute.
After losing a series of court cases, the IRS conceded in 2006 that the only remaining relevant portion of the tax is the tax on local telephone service. The IRS no longer attempts to collect the tax on other telephonic communications, recognizing that the rest of the statute is a vestige of a bygone era.
However, in 2007, the IRS demanded $16 million in back telephone excise taxes from bankrupt company WorldCom for data stream services related to its provision of dial-up Internet access in the early 2000s. The IRS contends that these services are “local telephone service,” while WorldCom argues that it is a communications service outside the scope of the statute. The Bankruptcy Court ruled for WorldCom, as did a federal judge, noting that the service was an intermediate service (not an end user service) and not telephonic-quality communication.
The federal Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, holding (1) that elements of the service could provide telephonic-quality communication, (2) that the IRS decision not to apply the tax to most communications services was not entitled to judicial deference, and (3) that to hold otherwise would produce “a strange result” of some services being taxed but not others.
WorldCom has appealed this decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, and the Tax Foundation filed a brief in support of the petition on May 21, 2014, requesting the Court to take the case.
Our brief makes two main points:
- The Court’s guidance is needed to prevent the Internal Revenue Service from reviving a tax that was bad policy to begin with and was never intended to be a permanent tax, acknowledging recent court decisions and IRS rulings limiting the scope of the tax to local telephone service.
- The courts should decline to expand the definition of “local telephone service” to new services not contemplated at the time of enactment, absent further congressional authorization.
The case is WorldCom, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service, No. 13-1269.
Get Email Updates from the Tax Foundation
We will never sell or share your information with third parties.
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official blog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.