Many people are beginning to wrap their minds around the House Republicans’ proposed destination-based cash-flow tax and what it means for tax reform. Most people are still looking into the tax’s impacts on trade and how...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- Colorado Voters Face Income Tax Increase Ballot Initiative
Colorado Voters Face Income Tax Increase Ballot Initiative
Today we released a new report analyzing Colorado's Amendment 66, an initiative on next month's ballot that will raise income taxes by almost $1 billion per year.
Highlights from our report:
- All taxpayers would see their tax bill go up, as what is currently a flat 4.63 percent rate on all income would become 5 percent on the first $75,000 (an 8 percent increase), and 5.9 percent on income above that (a 27 percent increase).
- The tax increase will directly hit the 95 percent of all Colorado businesses that pay taxes through the individual income tax code. These firms employ 57 percent of all Coloradans, and nationwide, create 64 percent of new jobs.
- Academic evidence strongly suggests that higher taxes, especially income taxes, are associated with lower economic growth and job creation. There is little evidence that taxes have "little influence" (to quote the proponents) on state economies.
- Proponents of Amendment 66 argue that a person making $30,000 per year will pay “about $4 per month” more in taxes, or the cost of “an ice cream cone.” At this income level, the additional $4 a month in taxes from Amendment 66 is better characterized as one less meal, not one less leisure good (such as an ice cream cone).
- Similarly, a taxpayer earning $50,000 annually will pay an additional $9 per month, which supporters equate to “a burrito with extra guac [sic].” In truth, this amounts to an additional $108 per year, on average, or roughly the cost of heating a typical Colorado home for one month during the winter.
- According to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), over 37 percent of Coloradans have an adjusted gross income of less than $25,000. A family earning this amount would pay an estimated $31.08 in additional taxes, which is equivalent to the average cost of feeding a one year old a healthy diet for one week.
- Finally, a two-earner, two-child household, with each parent earning $57,000, would see an estimated annual tax increase of $393, or roughly the cost of the employee portion of one month of family health insurance coverage. Similarly, a person earning $40,000 would see an approximate tax increase of $82 per year, or roughly the cost of a worker’s portion of one month of employer-provided health insurance.
- Raising taxes will not encourage continued post-recession economic recovery, especially in those areas of the state still struggling to realize economic gains.
Get Email Updates from the Tax Foundation
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official blog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.
Recent Blog Posts
Related State Articles
- Lunch links: Mileage Vs. Gas Tax Experiment Begins in Colorado; Recounts Coming in Maine on Marijuana and Income Tax; Rhode Island Considers Catching Up with Neighbor States on Marijuana Legalization
- Guide to Tax-Related Ballot Questions (UPDATED WITH RESULTS)
- Lunch Links: Growing Nature of Marijuana Taxes; Meeting of the Minds between EU and Ireland; Out of His Role as Trump, Alec Baldwin in Some Tax Trouble
- 1 of 33
- next ›