Tensions and passions were high at the California Supreme Court before they even turned to the Gillette Co. v. Franchise Tax Board case deciding whether the Multistate Tax Compact is a binding agreement or a model law...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- Budget Estimates the Costs of Tax Preferences
Budget Estimates the Costs of Tax Preferences
Buried inside the President’s budget released Monday was a section estimating the projected tax expenditures through 2011. What are tax expenditures? From the budget:
The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-344) requires that a list of “tax expenditures” be included in the budget. Tax expenditures are defined in the law as “revenue losses attributable to provisions of the Federal tax laws which allow a special exclusion, exemption, or deduction from gross income or which provide a special credit, a preferential rate of tax, or a deferral of liability.” (Official Budget Website)
Below is a list of the top tax expenditures on the individual income tax side over the next five years (2007-2011). Notice the preferential treatment that medical services and housing receive in the tax code, each totaling around $1 trillion over the next five years.
Exclusion of employer contributions for medical insurance premiums and medical care: $889 billion
Deductibility of mortgage interest on owner-occupied housing (home mortgage interest deduction): $471 billion
Capital Gains Exclusion on home sales: $318 billion
Deductibility of charitable contributions (total): $243 billion
Exclusion of net imputed rent: $205 billion
Child Credit: $200 billion
Exclusion of interest on public purpose state and local bonds: $168 billion
Deductibility of state and local income taxes, not including property (non-business): $162 billion
Exclusion of Social Security benefits (total): $149 billion
Deductibility of property taxes on owner-occupied homes: $74 billion
Another interesting aspect of these tax deductions is to look at how the expiring of the Bush tax cuts will dramatically alter many of them when moving from 2010 to 2011. The Bush tax cuts targeted regular tax liability and did little to AMT, meaning many more taxpayers are having their liability determined by AMT. And recall that AMT takes away many deductions – most specifically the deduction for state and local taxes. Therefore when 2011 hits and people’s regular tax liabilities will supersede their AMT liability, fewer people in AMT will mean that the deduction for state and local taxes will be claimed by many more taxpayers, as one can see in the numbers:
Tax expenditure for state and local taxes paid including property taxes in 2010 = $41.7 billion
Tax expenditure for state and local taxes paid including property taxes in 2011 = $72.4 billion
On the other hand, the Bush tax cuts expiring would also mean that the child tax credit would be scaled down. Therefore, the projected tax expenditure of the child tax credit would fall from $41.8 billion in 2010 to $31.7 billion the following year.
For more on the need to rid the tax code of these costly preferences and replace it with a neutral tax system that is simple and promotes economic efficiency, read Tax Foundation Chief Economist Patrick Fleenor's piece entitled America's Shrinking Income Tax Base Requires Higher Rates for Everyone.
Get Email Updates from the Tax Foundation
We will never sell or share your information with third parties.
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official blog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.