Proposed Seattle Bag Tax Criticized

June 30, 2008

Seattle's proposed "fee" on each plastic bag (actually an excise tax, since 15 of the 20 cents is to be used for general government spending) is catching some heat for different reasons. On one hand, retailers argue that it is not neutral, since the fee only applies to grocery bags and not to other retailers who give plastic bags to customers:

"If you're going to try to change behavior, everyone should be involved," said Holly Chisa of the Northwest Grocery Association, a group of larger stores.

From the other direction is criticism that the bag fee amounts to a regressive tax on food:

"There's a reason we don't have sales tax on food," said Councilman Richard McIver. "Putting a tax on the bag -- or the container I put the food into to get the food home -- seems oxymoronic."

McIver asked officials who answer to Nickels if the mayor had considered exempting food stamp customers from the fee. The mayor does not support such a move, said Dick Lilly, an analyst with Seattle Public Utilities. Nickels feels that would create a disincentive for some customers to reduce their waste, Lilly said. In addition, the mayor hopes to provide at least one free reusable a Seattle household, he has said.

More on Pigouvian taxes (taxes used to change behavior) here.

Subscribe to the Tax Foundation Newsletter

Follow Us

About the Tax Policy Blog

Subscribe to Tax Foundation - Tax Foundation's Tax Policy Blog The Tax Policy Blog is the official blog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.

Monthly Archive