CBPP says Regressive Cigarette Taxes are Okay Because: The Benefit Principle

March 20, 2014

On March 19th, 2014, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities released a paper praising President Obama’s plan to raise the federal cigarette excise tax in order to finance early childhood education.

The cigarette excise tax is regarded as a regressive tax because it targets smokers, a population that has lower levels of income on average than the U.S. population at large. From CBPP: “29 percent of poor adults smoke, compared to 18 percent of non-poor adults” and “expenditure for cigarettes account for a greater share of lower-income households’ budgets.”

Generally, CBPP is opposed to regressive taxes and favors the more progressive income tax. But this time, the regressivity of the cigarette tax doesn’t bother CBPP.

They say that a cigarette tax isn’t really that regressive because the population that pays the tax benefits the most from the tax through health benefits and increased funding for early childhood education. They are getting what they pay for.

In essence, the CBPP is endorsing the benefit principle: a principle that states that taxes people pay should reflect the benefits and the costs of services they receive.

I assume this means the CBPP will be more sympathetic to these statements now:

Subscribe to the Tax Foundation Newsletter

Follow Us

About the Tax Policy Blog

Subscribe to Tax Foundation - Tax Foundation's Tax Policy Blog The Tax Policy Blog is the official weblog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.

Monthly Archive