Many people are beginning to wrap their minds around the House Republicans’ proposed destination-based cash-flow tax and what it means for tax reform. Most people are still looking into the tax’s impacts on trade and how...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- Supporters of Measure 97 Mislead On Corporate Taxes
Supporters of Measure 97 Mislead On Corporate Taxes
Measure 97 continues to dominate the airwaves in Oregon as both supporters and opponents launch their campaigns on the ballot measure. The $6 billion tax increase would cost households in Oregon approximately $600 a year and raise prices by 1 percent. As supporters work to convince Oregonians to support the proposal, they continue to use the same talking point: Oregon ranks last among the states on corporate taxes. This talking point, however, is misleading.
There are a number of different ways to attempt to quantify Oregon’s relative rank on corporate taxes. Comparing Oregon’s top marginal tax rate (7.6 percent) is one way; it is the 18th highest nationally. Another way is to consider how much money Oregon’s corporate income tax raises in revenue on a per capita basis. In fiscal year 2014, Oregon’s corporate income tax collected $125 per capita, or 26th highest in the nation. A third way would be to consider how Oregon’s corporate tax code is structured. Our State Business Tax Climate Index ranks Oregon 37th nationally for overall corporate income tax structure. No way is perfect, as they each represent a different concept.
But the supporters of Measure 97 are not using this sort of data. They are using a report that quantifies business tax burdens and suggesting that it is the same thing as corporate tax burdens. Businesses and corporations, in this context, are not the same thing.
The report, “2016 State Business Tax Burden Rankings” from the Anderson Economic Group, focuses on business tax burdens, which is a much larger category, rather than corporate tax burdens. Businesses come in many different shapes and sizes, and they file their taxes in a variety of different forms too. Businesses are generally divided into two big categories: pass-through businesses or C corporations. Only C corporations file their taxes under the corporate tax code. Pass-through businesses file as individuals as the income “passes through” to the owners of the business.
The AEG report includes all businesses, not just C corporations, and includes 11 types of taxes that businesses pay. The corporate income tax is just one of those taxes included. The report includes other taxes, such as property taxes, sales taxes, individual income taxes on pass-through income, motor vehicle taxes, among others. The report specifically says “the corporate income tax is often seen as the most important state or local tax on businesses. However...of the 11 categories of state and local taxes we identify, corporate income taxes account for under 10% of the total tax burden for all states combined.”
This distinction is important. Oregon’s business tax burden is the lowest in the country according to this report, not because corporate taxes are low, but rather, because the state doesn’t have a sales tax. It is the absence of a sales tax driving this ranking, not low corporate income taxes. The report hammers this point home: “Oregon has no general sales tax, but otherwise is not among the ten lowest-burden states in any particular tax category.”
The State Business Tax Climate Index shows a similar result. The 37th rank noted above is for corporate income taxes, but the state is 11th overall, due to the absence of a sales tax and low property taxes.
This is not the first time that I have mentioned the misuse of the AEG data by Our Oregon. When the Oregon Consumer League and Our Oregon released their report in July on the relationship between state taxes and prices, I pointed out the issue at the time. I said:
“The report misuses a number of tax terms. For its measure of taxation, it uses a calculation of state business tax burdens. This is a broad measure that includes 11 types of taxes, including non-corporate taxes such as individual income taxes on pass-through businesses. It is a much broader measure than taxes on C corporations. Oregon ranks low on this measure, because of the state’s low property taxes and absence of a sales tax, not because corporate income taxes are low. The authors, however, seem to misunderstand their own data and use 'corporate taxes' and 'business taxes' interchangeably. These two terms are not synonymous.”
Supporters are also using a report from the Council on State Taxation (COST) to make a similar point on low corporate too. But again, the COST study is a measure of business taxes, not corporate taxes. This report notes that Oregon’s low burden is due to its “lack of a sales tax.” The report continues to say, “If sales tax revenue is excluded…[Oregon] moves from the lowest TEBTR [rank] to the 20th-lowest rate.”
All of this is not to say that Oregon’s corporate income tax structure is without flaws; its bottom third ranking on the State Business Tax Climate Index's corporate income tax subcomponent is a testament to its poor structure. But it’s not true to say that Oregon ranks last on corporate taxes.
I know that Our Oregon read my initial comments on the difference between business taxes and corporate taxes, but the error still continues. It is hard to have the important debate on Oregon’s corporate income taxes and Measure 97 when the supporters are being misleading with basic tax data.
For more on Measure 97, click here.
Follow Nicole on Twitter.
Get Email Updates from the Tax Foundation
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official blog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.