Illinois continues to struggle with its budget. The state’s most recent stopgap budget expired on December 31, 2016. To perhaps break up the political logjam, Illinois senators of both political parties have begun...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- Should Olympic Prize Money Be Taxed?
Should Olympic Prize Money Be Taxed?
On Monday, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) released a statement calling for the House of Representatives to pass a bill that would exempt Olympic athletes from paying the income tax on their prize money. He said, “Our Olympian and Paralympic athletes should be worried about breaking world records, not breaking the bank, when they earn a medal.” The proposal has already passed the Senate. It has been around since 2012 when first introduced by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL). Clearly, this proposal is good politics (who wants to tax winners?!), but this exemption is bad policy.
When U.S. Olympic athletes win medals, they are also supplemented with cash prizes by the U.S. Olympic Committee. The bonuses are $25,000 for a gold medal, $15,000 for a silver medal, and $10,000 for a bronze medal. Under current law, this prize money is considered income and taxed by the IRS. The proposal would exempt this income from the individual income tax.
It makes sense for the IRS to tax this prize money. Olympic athletes, just as most athletes, earn part of their income competing in events and earning prize money. For example, tennis players who will participate in the 2016 U.S. Open will compete for a total prize pool of $46 million. The winner of the men's and women's singles will each get $3.5 million. This prize money is income just as a teacher’s salary is income and is taxed as such. It does not make sense to exempt a specific source of income earned by a specific profession from the income tax, but tax all the income earned by everyone else.
Clearly, this exemption would not cost the Treasury a significant amount of revenue, but this is not how you should go about enacting tax policy. Taxes should raise enough money for government priorities while creating the fewest distortions possible. The tax base should be as broad as possible without taxing the same economic activity multiple times. A broader tax base would allow us to lower marginal tax rates and promote economic growth. This is why tax reformers are looking for ways to eliminate as many of these special exemptions in the code as possible, not add to them. It would simply be counterproductive to poke even more holes in the tax base.
Get Email Updates from the Tax Foundation
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official blog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.